Page 4 - Catalano_et_al_1996
P. 4

294 R. Catalano et al./ Tectonophysics 260 (1996) 291-323

         WELLS                                                                                                                 •oDREDGES

                   1. PAOLA EST  6. TRAPANI    11. LIPPONE           16. MARINEO       21. BIVONA   26. ONDA      31. OSCAR    OA
                   2. NILDE      7. MOZIA      12. MISTRETTA         17. C.DA TRIGLIA  22. PLATANI  27. PINA      32. ORIONE
                   3. NADA       8. MARINELLA  13. PIZZO CASTELLARO  1B. CAMPOBELLO    23. ERACLEA  28. CORVINA                ÀB +E
                   4. NARCISO    9. MENFI      14. ANGELO            19 SCIACCA        24. MANFRIA  29. MARAGONE
                   5. TANIA      10.LERCARA    15. VIZZINI           20. CIANCIANA     25. GELA     30. ARCHIMEDES             e c +F

000      •••

c:liiA.

                                                                                       ...22
                                                                                             .. 1~ •

                                                                                                                          1,5

                                                                                                   ..
                                                                                                       ..

Fig. 3. Grid zone C and G seismic reflection lines of Minister of lndustry of Italy and location map of dredge hauls (modified from
Antonelli et al., 1991) and commerciai borehole drills. Dredge symbols: A= Quaternary-Upper Miocene rocks and volcanics; B = Lower
Miocene-Oiigocene flysch; C= Eocene-Upper Jurassic deep marine carbonates; D= Liassic shallow platforrn carbonates; E= Upper
Triassic deep marine shales and carbonates; F = Hercynian-type cristalline rocks.

sent. Analysis of seismic attributes and reflector                   low frequency and variable latera! continuity. The
pattern analysis developed in the frame of a PhD                     reflection characteristics depend on the seismic
thesis (Sulli, 1994) made it possible to estimate the                source, processing and on the generai variation in
lithology and geometry of the studied successions.                   lithology, density and fabric of the sediments
The interpretations, based also on velocity analysis                 (Anselmetti and Eberli, 1993). Internai geometries
data, were calibrated by dredges and well log data,                  are regular over a wide area. The signa) is consistent
coming from adjacent areas. The different seismic                    with thick bedded carbonate platform rocks, as con-
signals generated by the different lithologies make it               firmed by well-control.
possible to distinguish various seismic facies (Fig.
4).                                                                     (3) Facies C presents medium amplitude and ve-
                                                                     locity, and high frequency; the signa!, which is ho-
   (l) Facies A is characterized by high to medium                   mogeneous but not continuous, is generated by thin
amplitude, variable frequency and very high veloc-                   bedded pelagic carbonates and marls.
ity. The seismic signa) is discontinuous and often
covered by diffraction effects. We associated this                      (4) Facies D is characterized by discontinuous and
facies to crystalline basement rocks.                                non homogeneous horizons, with alternation of high
                                                                     and low amplitude, high frequency and lower veloc-
   (2) Facies B is topped by a high-amplitude, high-                 ity. This facies corresponds to coarser clastic and
velocity reflector while the internai reflectors are of              argiiiaceous successions.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9