Page 4 - Bioconstructions_2018
P. 4

64                                               Gianmarco Ingrosso et al.


          and the studies have shown this to occur from the shallow to the deep sea
          (Kruz ˇi c, 2014; Piazzi et al., 2012; Teixido ´ et al., 2013; and references
          therein; Terro ´n-Sigler et al., 2016a; Vorberg, 2000).
             The management of bioconstructions, just as that of all components of
          natural capital, is based on three pillars:
          (a) Patterns—assessing the distribution of habitats and their conservation
              status.
          (b) Processes—understanding the drivers that determine the patterns and
              identifing stressors and their impacts.
          (c) Measures—enforcing management actions based on solid scientific
              evidence.
          This study focuses on the most important biogenic habitats along the
          8500km of the Italian coast, covering a large portion of the habitat diversity
          of the whole Mediterranean basin. Our aims are to: (1) give an agreed def-
          inition of bioconstruction; (2) review the existing distributions of marine
          bioconstructions along the Italian coasts; (3) investigate the potential for
          assessing connectivity of marine bioconstructions using different approaches
          (e.g. genetic analyses, beta diversity and biophysical models); (4) provide
          information about the age of some bioconstructions by radiocarbon dating;
          (5) assess the effects of common human pressures; and (6) propose new areas
          of critical ecological importance to be included in protection priorities.
             Based on this knowledge, recommendations for future research are pro-
          posed, together with guidelines for the conservation of coastal bioconstructions.


               2. PATTERNS
               2.1 What Is a Bioconstruction?
          In the scientific literature bioconstructions are also called “biogenic reefs” and
          this has generated several, commonly rather sterile, nomenclatural controver-
          sies. Boero (2017a), for instance, commented on the recent discovery of a new
          biogenic reef in front of the Amazon River delta (Moura et al., 2016), mostly
          built by crustose coralline algae, just like Mediterranean coralligenous bio-
          constructions (Ballesteros, 2006) that, however, was uncited.
             The term “bioconstruction” was first used in marine and coastal geology
          usually referring to a limestone structure of biogenic origin that has been built
          up by modular and sediment-binding organisms including macroalgae, corals,
          bryozoans and stromatoporoids (Fox, 2005). While describing a Silurian
          reef in Indiana (USA), Carozzi and Zadnik (1959) introduced the term
          “bioconstructed limestone” in geology, and the word “bioconstructed” was
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9