Page 4 - CELESTI-GRAPOW
P. 4

1122 L. Celesti-Grapow et al.

              2016; Galasso et  al.  2016; Stinca et  al.  in press).   tribution to more islands and those that have pro-
              In order to be able to make comparisons, we used   gressed to a subsequent stage of the establishment
              the same framework for the invasion process as that   process within the study area.
              adopted in the previous survey. We thus classified the
              species as casual (non-native plants that reproduce
              spontaneously outside cultivation, but do not form   Results
              self-replacing populations, and rely on repeated   We recorded 203 neophytes. Of these species, 147
              introductions for their persistence) or established   (72.4%) have become established on at least one is-
              (non-native plants that sustain self-replacing popul-  land, while the remaining 56 (27.6%) only occur as
              ations without direct human intervention), using   casuals across the study area. The established spe-
              the system standardized on a nationwide scale by   cies include 41 (20.2%) reported to be invasive on
              the working group for the non-native flora of Italy   at least one island. The current list thus contains
              (Celesti-Grapow et  al.  2009).  According to this   49 more species than the previous data-set, which
              system,  we  further  classified  as  invasive  any alien   listed 154 neophytes, 105 of which were established
              established species that have at least one population   (68.2%) and 49 casuals (31.8%) (Pretto et al. 2012).
              in the study area with individuals that have dispersed,   The recorded flora consists of 57 families and 131
              survived and reproduced at multiple sites (Blackburn   genera. The families and genera represented by the
              et al. 2011), i.e. in a strictly biological sense that is   highest number of species are shown in Figures  2
              based on their rate of spread, regardless of whether the   and 3, respectively.
              species have a negative environmental and economic   The families represented most are Asteraceae (25
              impact. Although the term invasive is still used both   species), Fabaceae (17 species), Poaceae and Solan-
              in the scientific literature and in the applied field   aceae (15 species) and Amaranthaceae (12 species),
              with  different  meanings,  this  approach  proved  to   followed by two families that are represented rela-
              be particularly useful for the purposes of our survey   tively little in the flora of Italy, i.e. Aizoaceae and
              because it makes a distinction between plants that   Cactaceae (10 species).  Twenty-nine families are
              spread more rapidly from those that cause the most   represented by only one species. The families with
              serious problems, which are two groups that do not   the highest number of invasive species are Asteraceae
              necessarily overlap, as species that spread fastest are   (9), Fabaceae (5) and Cactaceae (4).
              not always those that have the worst impacts.
                 The information derived from the various sources
              was integrated into a comprehensive database. The
              establishment level of the species in the study area,
              defined as casual, naturalized (i.e. established non-in-
              vasive) and invasive, was assigned on the basis of the
              highest stage in the invasion process documented in
              any island. This means that species were considered
              as being established if they are so on at least one is-
              land. In the present paper, we only deal with those
              species that are classified as neophytes on a nation-
              wide scale, i.e. plant species introduced in Italy after
              the year 1492 (see Celesti-Grapow et  al.  2009 for
                details on the method). We excluded from the pres-
              ent analysis archaeophytes, i.e. ancient  introductions,
              which remain a controversial group in the Mediter-
              ranean region due to the insufficient data to clear-
              ly define the origin of several taxa  (Celesti-Grapow
              et al. 2009; Zohary et al. 2012).
                 To document the island’s introduced flora and
              to outline the major changes that have occurred re-
              cently, we analysed the composition of the neophyte
              vascular flora of the study area as a whole, and we
              compared the current figures with those recorded at
              the time of the previous survey, i.e. approximately
              in the years 2006–2007 (Celesti-Grapow et al. 2009,   Figure 2. The most represented families in the non-native flora
              2010b; Pretto et al. 2012). To highlight those taxa   of the 37 islands analysed classified according to their level
              that are most responsible for recent changes, we    of establishment. The numbers next to each bar and those in
                                                                brackets refer to the total number of species and the number of
              analysed those species that have extended their dis-  invasive species in the family, respectively (see text for definitions).
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9