Page 25 - Bioconstructions_2018
P. 25

Mediterranean Bioconstructions Along the Italian Coast        85




                   3. PROCESSES
                   3.1 Building/Bioeroding Processes and the Age
                       of Bioconstructions
              The growth of these bioconstructions depends on a positive balance between
              building and bioeroding processes (e.g. Garrabou and Ballesteros, 2000). Cor-
              alline macroalgae of the genera Mesophyllum, Lithophyllum and Neogonio-
              lithon provide the greatest contribution to coralligenous bioconstructions
              (Ballesteros, 2006). Several species of the genus Peyssonnelia,mostly
              Peyssonnelia heteromorpha (Zanardini) Athanasiadis and Peyssonnelia rosa-marina
              Boudouresque & Denizot, also participate in the building process as do as
              many calcified nonphotosynthetic organisms, such as the foraminiferan
              M. miniacea, cnidarians and bryozoans. Molluscs and serpulid polychaetes
              can play a minor constructive role.
                 Cyanobacteria (e.g. Hyella caespitosa Bornet & Flahault, 1888; Mastigocoleus
              testarum Lagerheim ex Bornet & Flahault, 1886; Leptolyngbya terebrans
              (Bornet & Flahault ex Gomont) Anagnostidis & Koma ´rek, 1988), perforating
              sponges (e.g. Cliona celata Grant, 1826 and Cliona viridis (Schmidt, 1862)), bor-
              ing molluscs (e.g. Hiatella arctica (Linnaeus, 1767), Rocellaria dubia (Pennant,
              1777) and Lithophaga (Linnaeus, 1758)), sipunculids (e.g. Aspidosiphon muelleri
              Diesing, 1851) and grazing sea urchins (e.g. Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck,
              1816)) often erode or dissolve coralligenous bioconstructions (Ballesteros,
              2006; Sartoretto, 1998; Sartoretto and Francour, 1997).
                 The bioconstruction process in CWC reefs is mainly due to the branched
              stony corals M. oculata and L. pertusa. When solitary corals such as D. dianthus
              settle on these colonies, they can contribute also. Moreover, a symbiotic inter-
              action with the polychaete Eunice norvegica (Linnaeus, 1767) seems to signifi-
              cantly help the bioconstruction process (Mueller et al., 2013). This species
              forms parchment-like tubes within living coral branches that are later calcified
              by the coral (Buhl-Mortensen, 2001). In particular, E. norvegica is mainly
              involved in strengthening the reef structure by thickening and connecting coral
              branches (Roberts, 2005; Tursietal.,2004). In addition, massive sponges such
              as Pachastrella monilifera Schmidt, 1868 and Poecillastra compressa (Bowerbank,
              1866) can form mixed grounds with CWCs, as it happens in Santa Maria di
              Leuca and in the Bari Canyon (Bo et al., 2012b; Longo et al., 2005).
                 A suite of endolithic assemblages of microborers (i.e. bacteria, fungi and
              foraminiferans) and macroborers (i.e. sponges) bioerode CWC bio-
              constructions. The main macroboring sponges belong to the genera Cliona
              and Spiroxya (Longo et al., 2005). The bioerosion process seems to be
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30