Page 111 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 111

therefore, of attending to culture as the fourth pillar of sustainability. Of course the genealogy

               of terms such as traditional knowledge can be traced back further than the period of the 1990s


               and  2000s.  For  instance,  traditional  knowledge  is  epistemologically  grounded  in  certain


               forms of anthropology, in notions such as Malinowski’s “native science” (Ståle 2008, p. 30).

               However,  the  term  traditional  knowledge  came  to  the  fore  in  this  period.  Defined  by  the

               Convention on Biodiversity’s Article 8 (j) (Convention on Biological Diversity [CBD] n.d.,


               para. 1; 2012, p. 6) traditional knowledge encompasses:


                        [T]he knowledge, innovations and practices of indigenous and local communities
                        around the world. Developed from experience gained over centuries and adapted
                        to the local culture and environment... It tends to be collectively owned and takes
                        the  form  of  stories,  songs,  folklore,  proverbs,  cultural  values,  beliefs,  rituals,
                        community laws, local language, and agricultural practice...Traditional knowledge
                        is mainly of a practical nature, particularly in such fields as agriculture, fisheries,
                        health, horticulture, and forestry.




               In  addition,  traditional  knowledge  ‘generally  refer[s]  to  the  long  standing  traditions  and

               practices of certain regional, indigenous, or local communities’ (Trosper & Parrotta 2012, p.


               6).

                       Traditional and local became conflated terms, used interchangeably, and in opposition


               to modern and global.  In the context of marine issues, the traditional and local knowledge

               began to be included, albeit at a slower rate than terrestrial issues (Ruddle 2000, p. 278), in

               discussions  over  fishery  conflicts  and  management,  including  the  allocation  of  quota.  In


               marine contexts, definitions often draw on wider conceptual framings of traditional and local


               knowledge,  and  are  articulated  in  much  the  same  way  as  the  definition  above.  Often  in

               fishery  contexts  traditional  and  local  knowledge  is  understood  to  be  based  on  empirical

               observations, and to be practically orientated (Ruddle 2000, p. 279). It is knowledge that is


               ‘acquired  through  continuous  interaction  with  the  environment,  and  transmitted  between

               successive  generations,  has  been  identified  as  indigenous,  traditional  or  local  ecological





                                                                                                        99
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116