Page 113 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 113
Giudetti also says that fisheries often use passive gear and organise the profession into small
family sized businesses (in Piante 2012, n.p.). These sentiments mirror those expressed in my
interviews with a variety of stakeholders, which I draw in chapter four.
Within a context in which environmental problems are increasingly defined by
modernity, industrialisation and the limitations of Western knowledge, traditional and local
knowledge gain a utilitarian value. For example, speaking about local knowledge in fishing
communities, Ruddle suggests that ‘they [local knowledge systems] should be conserved
because their utility may only be revealed at some later date or owing to their intrinsic value
as part of the world’s global heritage’ (2000, p. 277). Begossi and Silvano (2005) suggest that
local ecological knowledge is positioned well to complement fishery management. They
demonstrate this through a cross-cultural survey that compares Australian aboriginal and
Brazilian fisher knowledge – migratory movements, feeding habits, reproduction – of
Pomatomus saltatrix (bluefish). They illustrate the accuracy of local knowledge in relation to
scientific knowledge, concluding that fisher knowledge in both Australia and Brazil agrees
with data of species population elsewhere. They suggest that drawing on such local
knowledge and fisher knowledge could improve current knowledge, and local fisheries
management and community consultation. Such sentiments are echoed in Freeman et al. who
argue that the ecological knowledge of fishers is critical to fishery scientists and managers
(2000), and in Johnson et al. (2007, p. 2) identify an epistemological gap between the
ecological knowledge of fishers and scientists – an idea that I take up in chapter five in
relation to my case studies in San Pietro and Favignana. Johannes et al. (2000) add to the
discussion by presenting five case studies from the Solomon Islands skipjack tuna fisheries,
Inuit whale hunters in Canada, Alaskan Bowhead whaling, and two cases of the beluga
whale. Each case illustrates how indigenous or traditional knowledge can prove scientific
101