Page 149 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 149

question  of  power:  the  power  to  define  and  implement  a  discourse  and  lay  out  its

                   rules. This also returns us briefly to assemblages. However, perhaps Foucault’s term


                   “dispositif”, which is most often translated as apparatus, is more useful temporarily


                   because it brings discourse in relation to a wider assemblage through the coordinates

                                 53
                   of  knowledge .  Dispositif  is  related  to  assemblage  in  that  it  calls  attention  to
                   heterogeneous elements and relations among them (Pløger 2008, p. 55). A dispositif is


                   first:


                            …a  thoroughly  heterogeneous  ensemble  consisting  of  discourses,
                            institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative
                            measures,  scientific  statements,  philosophical,  moral  and  philanthropic
                            propositions  –  in  short  the  said  as  much  as  the  unsaid...The  apparatus
                            itself  is  a  system  of  relations  that  can  be  established  between  these
                            elements’ (Foucault 1980, p. 194)



                   Dispositif  situates  discourse  as  part  of  a  wider  ensemble,  which  can  contain


                   ‘material/technical/textual  forces,  installations  and  configurations  that,  in  certain

                   relations  or  constellations,  obtain  power  to  regulate,  govern,  institutionalize  or


                   empower a specific element…’ (Pløger 2008, p. 56). Furthermore, since ‘[d]ispositif

                   are concrete, situational ensembles of forces of becoming…where people are trying to


                   grasp what they are seeing when talking about things in space’ (Pløger 2008, p. 59),

                   we can say that there is always a connection to knowledge and what is considered


                   truth.  Paul  Rabinow  (2003,  p.  54)  draws  attention  to  an  important  dimension  of  a

                   dispositif.  He  says  that  a  dispositif  is  a  specific  and  dominating  response  to  a


                   historical problem (Rabinow 2003, p. 54).

                          This is the case in an ocean sustainability crisis through which statements are

                   made that define the crisis and the response to that crisis, based upon particular forms


                   of  knowledge.  This  is  also  the  case  for  devices  that  measure  and  articulate

                   sustainability. Dispositifs are always inscribed in a play of power and also linked to



                                                                                                   137
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154