Page 20 - Lloreta_alii_2001
P. 20

above results and discussion lead to question the hypothesis of “natal homing” for BFT

                  (Cury, 1994; Cury et al., 1998). This hypothesis postulates that the newly hatched


                  individuals retain environmental cues,  which determine their future spawning

                  environment. In the case of BFT, natal homing is first based on the millennial


                  observations of BFT migrations into the Mediterranean (Doumenge, 1998), but this

                  does not imply that the size of the migrating population remained constant over


                  centuries. The second argument for natal homing is that only two BFT spawning sites

                  (i.e. sites where both fully ripe individuals with hydrated oocytes and eggs are found)

                  have been identified. However, Mather et al., (1995) underlined that estimating BFT


                  spawning sites from BFT gonad conditions are subject to many limitations: (i) fully ripe

                  BFT individuals are difficult to catch on hook as they are reluctant to feed (Sella, 1929),


                  (ii) BFT can travel a great distance in short periods (Gunn and Block, 2001; Lutcavage

                  et al., 2000), and (iii) BFT is a multiple spawner (Medina et al., 2002). Finally, recent


                  archival tagging of BFT has shown a large spectrum of migration patterns (including

                  western residency and trans-Atlantic movements, with or without annual visitation of a


                  known spawning site) and the possibility of new breeding areas (Block et al., 1998;

                  2001; Gunn and Block, 2001; Lutcavage et al., 1999; 2000), a set of observations that


                  do not support the “natal homing” hypothesis.

                        The alternative hypothesis to “natal homing” is that individuals track the optimal

                  environmental conditions that will maximise their total reproductive output (Balchen,


                  1979; Harden Jones, 1968; Potts and Wootton, 1984). This hypothesis of “opportunistic

                  spawning” is generally accepted for tropical tuna (Cayré, 1990). Their remarkable


                  potential of migration allow them to explore a large range of environmental conditions

                  and to select the most suitable ones for their physiological and biological needs.


                  However, unlike tropical tuna, temperate tuna feed and spawn in different areas





                                                            21
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25