Page 7 - Maccarrone_etal_2014
P. 7

V. Maccarrone et al. / Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 14: 173-181 (2014)                179
Table 4. Surface of net damaged and corresponding economic value of the damages for the control and pinger nets

Total surface of net damaged after 29 hauls (m2)            small hole (<20 cm)    17.34 m2   26.44 m2
                                                          hole and tears (>20 cm)
Mean surface of net damaged after 29 hauls per every                               138.77 m2  147.52 m2
50 m of net (m2)                                                   TOTAL
                                                            small hole (<20 cm)    156.11 m2  173.96 m2
Total cost of the damage in Euros                         hole and tears (>20 cm)
                                                                                    0.96 m2    1.47 m2
Total cost of the damage after 29 hauls for each 50 m              TOTAL
of net                                                      small hole (<20 cm)     7.71 m2    8.20 m2
                                                          hole and tears (>20 cm)
                                                                                    8.67 m2    9.66 m2
                                                                   TOTAL             7.88 €    12.02 €
                                                            small hole (<20 cm)      63.08€
                                                          hole and tears (>20 cm)   70.96 €   67.05 m2
                                                                                     0.44 €    79.07 €
                                                                   TOTAL             3.50 €     0.67 €
                                                                                     3.94 €     3.73 €
                                                                                                4.39 €

net but also, albeit with a minor force, attack the       the pinger net, based on the PPUE, reaches the
pinger net. Additionally, in the assessment of the ED     production levels obtained with the control net five
of the fishing gear, we considered the destruction of     days in advance. This result assumes additional
the net surface without taking into account the           meaning if we consider that the costs that the boat
efficiency of the net decrease in proportion to the       supports during each day of fishing were cut down
number of holes and that the fishermen replace the net    (e.g., fuel, engine oil, damage, wear and tear of
before its complete destruction. Based on this “net-      equipment, and crew costs), which would improve the
surface damaging method”, the difference between          economic and environmental sustainability aspects of
the pinger net and the control net is negligible          the fishing activity.
(approximately 10 €). Although it is a rare event, any
attack on the network pinger by the dolphins is an              This evaluation showed that the technological
event to be considered, this would result in a lower      investment of the fishing company requires economic
cost-effectiveness of this technology.                    sustainability useful to justify their costs. Particularly
                                                          in Sicily, the artisanal fishing boats are used an
      As reported in other studies (Brotons et al.,       average of 110 fishing days (ISMEA, 2005; ISMEA,
2008a; Buscaino et al., 2009; Gönener et al., 2012;       2006). Based on these data and the data collected and
Dawson et al., 1988; Broton et al., 2008b; Gazo et al.,   analysed in this study, it can be assumed that an
2008; Lauriano et al., 2004), the use of sounds           artisanal fishing boat with gill nets and PPUE levels
emitted by specific acoustic devices can, under some      similar to those recorded in the presence of predation
circumstances (Dawsons et al., 1998), deter the           could recover the investment in the pinger technology
approach of dolphins to the fishing gear, which           in less than one fishing season. In this contest, we
reduces the by-catch, the damage to the fishing           have to consider that the data obtained in this study
equipment, and the loss of fish. In fact, the pinger      are related to a relatively short period (two months),
appears to be one of the few effective methods able to    and longer periods of observation should be
reduce the problem of depredation-interaction (Broton     considered to exclude any habituation phenomenon
et al., 2008b; ISMEA, 2005).                              between the dolphins and the pinger. However, in
                                                          many Italian artisanal fishing companies, there is a
      Unfortunately, the technical-scientific proposals   widespread practice to change the type of gear used
to reduce the depredation activities are not always       during the fishing season (IUCN, 2008; Taylor,
accepted by fishermen. This resistance is partly due to   1997). This equipment replacement is associated to
a lack of knowledge of the functional principles of the   the turnover of the target species and consequently to
operational techniques. The reluctance by the             the economic sustainability of the activity (IUCN,
fishermen against the use of pingers could be             2008). Even in the case under study, the fishing boat
explained by three main factors: scepticism about the     worked with gillnets for approximately 3 to 4 months
effectiveness of the devices, difficulty in               per season/year (80 days) and with trammel nets for
handling/utilisation, and lack of knowledge of the        the remainder of the fishing season.
costs/benefits ratio.
                                                                The data derived from the experimental fishing
      This study allowed us to assess the economic        allowed us to evaluate the total ED to be 1397 € in
damage reported by the fishing equipment and the          900 mt of net (77.65 € in 50 m units of net; see Table
economic loss of fish products during experimental        3), which is the loss of income due to the missed
fishing. Moreover, the data of the economic fishing       catches of the target species as a result of dolphin
activities allowed us to evaluate the ROI for the         depredation.
adoption of this technology.
                                                                The results obtained from the economic analysis
      Our results have shown that, during the             demonstrate that the critical factors of pinger
experimental fishing, the pinger net exhibited a          technology could be represented by the economic
production advantage compared with the control net,       aspects of the investment sustainability, the ROI, and
which improved the efficiency and effectiveness of        the use of economic incentives for the purchase of the
the fishing activities. In addition, in 29 fishing days,
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9