Page 3 - Soldatini_etal2015
P. 3
Conservation Physiology • Volume 3 2015 Research article
are chronically stressed and whether they show any dysfunc- coincides with the tourist season on the island, when caves Downloaded from http://conphys.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on March 12, 2016
tion of the HPA axis, in an attempt to apply a physiological are visited daily by boats. Tourists are not allowed to land,
approach to conservation biology, following the suggestions but the outer part of the colony is nevertheless exposed to
of Cyr and Romero (2009). noise from boat engines and voices, with an average of 10–15
boats approaching the entrance on days with calm seas, while
Given that this species has one single-egg brood per year, the inner sub-colony is completely silent and not exposed to
the costs of interrupting breeding activity are very high, and any disturbance.
nest abandonment would have serious consequences for the
breeding population. Given the extremely high value of the Both sub-colonies have been visited for ringing every summer
single clutch, we hypothesized that birds should show habitu- since 1991, while breeding success and parental behaviour have
ation or show low sensitivity to moderate anthropogenic been monitored more intensely since 2007 (Albores-Barajas
stress, such as boat traffic. To test this hypothesis, we com- et al., 2015) with 1 month of fieldwork in July every year. Birds
pared two groups of birds, i.e. exposed or not exposed to caught during the present study where ringed in previous years,
human disturbance. Besides the classical stress response to so they were not handled for the first time. Fieldwork was car-
handling stress, following Wingfield et al. (1998), we also con- ried out under permission from the Marine Protected Area no.
ducted a ‘population stress response’, in which we sampled 3/2011 and 1721/2012, and Regione Siciliana.
different individuals of the same group every 5 min over a
period of 40 min. In this way, we obtained the stress response Experimental procedure
of a population to human disturbance. Furthermore, we con-
ducted both ACTH and DEX challenge tests, following Cyr Experiments were carried out during two field seasons in June
and Romero (2009), to investigate whether the birds were 2011 and 2012, when most breeding pairs were brooding.
chronically stressed because of the boat traffic or showed Field work always started at ∼10.00 h and was carried out
signs of habituation or reduced sensitivity. only in conditions of good weather, with no relevant differ-
ences in environmental conditions between the 2 years. We
Our results suggest that breeding storm petrels are not approached the cave by rowing a small rubber boat or swim-
chronically stressed by a mild stressor, such as boat visits, or ming, then climbed up to the nest sites of the outer or inner
alternatively, that there exist individuals within the species chamber of the cave, avoiding any kind of noise. This
that show a reduced sensitivity to this stressor and can there- approach usually took 5 min, and we started sampling imme-
fore breed in tourist-exposed areas without showing physio- diately afterwards. We sampled the outer chamber first and
logical signs of chronic stress. However, our data indicate that then moved to the inner chamber, from where noise produced
this type of adaptation might also have negative consequences, in the outer one cannot be heard. Every time, we sampled dif-
because any further stressors might elicit in an habituated/less ferent nest clusters in order to reduce disturbance to a mini-
sensitive bird an even stronger stress response, with possible mum. In the outer chamber there are three nest clusters
dramatic consequences. separated by rock walls, and in the inner chamber there are
four nest clusters on different terraces, allowing us to work at
Materials and methods the lower level while leaving the upper ones undisturbed.
Study site and species We quantified the physiological stress response of adult
storm petrels by measuring the plasma levels of CORT (see
We studied a colony of ∼2500 breeding pairs of the ‘Radioimmunoassay procedure and biochemical validations’
Mediterranean subspecies of the European storm petrel on below). Blood samples (∼100 μl) were collected from the wing
Marettimo Island, Italy (37°58′20″N, 12°3′20″E; Albores- vein with heparinized capillaries and centrifuged. The plasma
Barajas et al., 2012). The study population is composed of was separated and kept on ice until returning to the station,
two main sub-colonies: a small (about 150 nests) outer col- and then stored at −20°C. After obtaining the blood sample,
ony, more exposed to external disturbances, and a larger we measured wing length, tarsal length, bill depth and width
colony in the inner part of the cave. The outer chamber of the and head size in order to estimate body condition.
cave has open access to the sea and is exposed to human dis-
turbance, i.e. noise from boats accessing the entrance of the Experiments
cave during the tourist season, which coincides with the
breeding season. The second (inner) chamber is further inside, Experiment 1: individual stress response
and no noise can be heard from there; furthermore, it is more
difficult to access and can thus be considered free from During the breeding seasons 2011 and 2012, we compared
human disturbance. This provides an excellent model to com- the stress response between disturbed and non-disturbed
pare stress responses between ‘human-disturbed’ and ‘non- groups (n = 4 from each group in 2011; and n= 10 non-dis-
disturbed’ breeding sub-colonies. Storm petrels lay single-egg turbed and n = 11 disturbed in 2012). A baseline blood sam-
clutches asynchronously, starting in May–June. Most hatch- ple was collected within 5 min of entering the cave chamber.
ing occurs during the first half of July; our fieldwork was Thus, in 2011 only one bird per colony was sampled each day
conducted during the brooding period. The breeding season on our arrival and then after 30 min, while in 2012 using the
same procedure, we used the control and saline-injected
groups of experiment 3 (for more details see ‘Experiment 3:
3