Page 5 - Tomasello_Borra_etal2009
P. 5

Seagrass meadows at the extreme of environmental tolerance      Tomasello, Di Maida, Calvo, Pirrotta, Borra & Procaccini

performed using a Bayesian method (Rannala & Moun-              obtained in this study and existing lepidochronological
tain 1997) and tested over 1000 replicates, utilizing the       series collected in previous studies carried out in the same
software GENCLASS ver. 2.0 (Piry et al. 2004).                  area (MURST 2003). This allowed us to increase the time
                                                                range and the number of retrodated shoots from 29 to
   A CFA (correspondence factorial analysis) based on           55 years and from 243 to 1009, respectively. To detect the
allele frequency was achieved with the software GENETIX         pattern of flowering occurrence in space and time, the
ver. 4.1 (Belkhir et al. 1996–2002) to visualize genetic        following indices were calculated: (i) meadow flowering
relationships among populations and individuals.                frequency (FF) as the fraction of years that a given mea-
                                                                dow has flowered, (ii) shoot flowering probability (Pf) as
Growth and flowering performance analysis                        the fraction of flowering stalks per total number of shoot
                                                                annual segments, (iii) meadow flowering intensity (FI) as
Estimates of growth performance of Posidonia oceanica,          fraction of shoots presenting stalks within a particular
expressed in terms of annual rhizome elongation and             year, and (iv) annual flowering prevalence (FP) as the
annual leaf formation, were obtained by the lepidochro-         fraction of meadows flowering in a given year (Diaz-Al-
nological analysis (Pergent 1990). This reconstructive age-     mela et al. 2006). If the shoots coming from both data
ing technique is based on the analysis of cyclic variations     sources were collected in the same sampling site, a unique
in the sheath thickness. Cycles are delimited by two con-       value per each index was calculated. Otherwise, if they
secutive minimum sheaths’ thickness, corresponding to a         were collected in more than one station per site (within
1-year period (lepidochronological year). Lepidochrono-         less than 1 km distance or at different depth), the index
logical years were dated starting from the rhizome apex         values were computed by averaging the values of different
(sampling year) downward and then matching the cycle            stations (Diaz-Almela et al. 2006).
of sheath thickness with the corresponding rhizome seg-
ment. Annual leaf formation and rhizome elongation                 All indices were estimated according to minimum sam-
were derived, respectively, from the number of sheaths          ple size specific for each index proposed by Diaz-Almela
and the length of rhizome segment per lepidochronologi-         et al. (2006, 2007). Statistical analyses have been carried
cal year. Moreover, the shoot age was determined by add-        out using SPSS 14.
ing the number of annual rhizome segments from the
bearing axis and the most recent year (Pergent &                Results
Pergent-Martini 1990). This method also made it possible
to detect and date the past flowering occurrence per             Genetic variability and structure within sites
shoot across time by finding floral stalk remains between
the sheaths (Pergent et al. 1989). Only the most recent         A total of 80 alleles were identified for the 13 micro-
lepidochronological year has been considered for compar-        satellite loci utilized. According to the total number of
ison of growth performance among sites, as the temporal         alleles, the theoretical number of genotypes was
horizon of the time series varied significantly.                 Ng = 1.12 · 10+14, showing the high polymorphism of
                                                                the markers utilized. Seventeen genotypes from the total
Statistical analysis                                            of 218 samples analysed were not complete for one to
Differences of mean growth performances among sites             two loci and were excluded from the assessment of the
were assessed by linear model (LM) (Underwood 1997).            basic statistics. Of the 201 complete multilocus genotypes,
If the age of shoots sampled was different among sites,         192 were distinct (Table 1). Within-population pairwise
the possible confounding effect of shoot age has been           analysis of allele sharing showed that, in the Atolls
taken into account by including it as covariate in the sta-     population, in 20 cases multilocus genotypes (MLG) were
tistical model (Calvo et al. 2006; Tomasello et al. 2007).      different only in one allele. Only one case was recorded
Before parameterization, residual homoscedasticity were         among all the other populations analysed (i.e. Re´cif site).
assessed using the Levene test (Glaser 1983). When the          Nevertheless, among the 20 pairs present in the Atolls
heteroscedasticity of residuals was present, the response       site, only in one case did the psex value suggest a merging
variable has been transformed to fit the assumptions of          of two MLGs in one MLL (Table 1).
linear models. In the parameterization used for LM, it
was required to refer all results to the intercept, a baseline     Clonal richness, expressed as R, ranged from 0.79 in
conventional category that, in this case, was set with the      the Atolls to 1.0 in all the other populations except the
Favignana site. Finally the effects were presented in the       Re´cif (Table 1). Average clonal diversity for the two Stag-
original scale to facilitate the interpretation of results.     none lagoon sites (R = 0.86; Atolls, Re´cif) was lower than
                                                                for open sea sites (R = 1.00).
   For flowering occurrence, the analysis was made taking
into account two data sources: lepidochronological series          Expected heterozygosis (Hexp) and observed hetero-
                                                                zygosity (Hobs) values ranged, respectively, from 0.36

292                                                             Marine Ecology 30 (2009) 288–300 ª 2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10