Page 33 - ebsaws-2014-03
P. 33

Page 32

SPA/BD           Protocol CBD selection criteria        Notes

selection criteria

I. Uniqueness            a. Uniqueness or rarity

                         b. Biological productivity     High productivity is a rare feature in
                                                        oligotrophic Mediterranean Open
                                                        Seas

II. Natural                                             The CBD uses representativeness as
representativeness                                      a way to gauge the value the network
                                                        as a whole, not to evaluate individual
                                                        sites

III. Diversity           c. Biological diversity

IV. Naturalness          d. Special importance for life Enhances the biodiversity of an area
                         history of species
                         e. Naturalness

V. Presence of habitats  f. Importance for threatened,  These attributes render a species or
that are critical to     endangered or declining        habitat particularly susceptible to
endangered, threatened   species and/or habitats        threats
or endemic species       g. Vulnerability, fragility,
                         sensitivity, slow recovery

VI. Cultural                                            The CBD is not concerned with
representativeness                                      cultural representativeness

                    Table 3-2. Commonalities SPAMI criteria and CBD criteria.

For the third step in the development of a blueprint of a Mediterranean network of MPAs, i.e., the
identification of sites within each priority conservation area where the creation of SPAMIs is
actually proposed, our recommendation is to follow the process detailed in the CBD report. The
report suggests that planners:

    • separately consider the priority conservation area into pelagic and benthic realms;

    • identify sites addressing ecological importance and vulnerability;

    • address the requirements of ecological coherence through representativity, connectivity and
         replication; and finally

    • assess the adequacy and viability of the selected sites as functional MPAs based on
         considerations of size, shape, buffering and management feasibility.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38