Page 14 - 36 Elevation of the last interglacial highstand in Sicily
P. 14

ARTICLE IN PRESS

16 F. Antonioli et al. / Quaternary International 145– 146 (2006) 3–18

Pleistocene terraces that are visible in the Marsala area    Sicilian coastline into four sectors, each characterized by
above the MIS 5.5 terrace occurring at 34 m.                 different MIS 5.5 heights and uplift rates:

   The inner margin of the GTS is found at an elevation         Sector 1: NW Sicily: here we calculate a mean uplift
of 200 m in the Marsala coastal area and at about 400 m      rate of 37 mm/ka, with a maximum of 224 and a
on the southern coast (Fig. 2). Notably, in the Marsala      minimum of À40 mm/ka, leading us to regard this as a
area the younger terraces are cut into and below the         quasi-stable area. Nevertheless, some dislocations in this
outer edge of the GTS, while in the south the GTS            sector probably result from recently identified post MIS
surface appears to descend beneath the sea. It may be        5.5 strike-slip faulting that in some places continues into
that a Tyrrhenian terrace was formed in this area            the late Holocene, for example at St. Vito where
(between Trifontane and Agrigento, Fig. 2) but has since     Dendropoma platforms dated at only 650–400 years are
been drowned. Such subsidence could be linked, at least      displaced (Fig. 3B).
in part to tectonic loading beneath the Gela frontal
thrust system. This suggestion is consistent with the           Sector 2: S Sicily: along this coastline, some 350 km in
Quaternary depression of the Gela–Catania foredeep           length, there appear to be no MIS 5.5 outcrops. The
farther east, while the emergence of the Hyblean             inferred subsidence may be due to tectonic loading at
Plateau, unrepresented along the southern coast, may         the Gela frontal thrust system.
be primarily related to the presence of major lower plate
structures such as the Malta Escarpment and the Scicli          Sector 3: SE Sicily: in this area, dominated by the
fault zone (Fig. 2). Such speculations also appear           Hyblean Plateau, we estimate a mean uplift rate of
consistent with the appreciable Tyrrhenian uplift along      85 mm/ka, with a maximum of 216 and a minimum of
the Monte Tauro–Augusta coast closest to the Malta           À24 mm/ka. As with the NW sector we accordingly
Escarpment and with the Lampedusa data indicating            regard this as a quasi-stable coast, based on the low
essentially no uplift southwards away from the thrust        elevations of MIS 5.5 deposits, although affected by the
belt.                                                        proximity of the Malta Escarpment offshore. Adjacent
                                                             to this structure the MIS 5.5 terrace reaches its
   The highest uplift rates occur north of the thrust front  maximum elevation of about +32 m. Farther south
on Mt. Etna near Catania and at Taormina, places also        along the coast near Siracusa, another terrace at 105 m
adjacent to major coast-bounding structures (Malta           has also been proposed as MIS 5.5 (Bianca et al., 1999)
Escarpment and Messina fault system; Fig. 2). This           although, in our view, this interpretation is not well
region is affected by north–south compression and            supported by the available evidence.
east–west extension as well as possibly being influenced
by slab rollback and detachment and thermal inputs              Sector 4: NE Sicily: here we estimate a mean uplift
from asthenopheric upwelling (Lanzafame and Bous-            rate of 924 mm/ka, with a maximum of 1344 (corre-
quet, 1997; Gvirtzman and Nur, 1999).                        sponding to the eastern flank of Etna in close proximity
                                                             to the coast-bounding Malta Escarpment) and a
   Finally, the overall main displacements in the            minimum of 704 mm/ka. Regional north–south com-
Tyrrhenian coastal areas can be viewed as controlled         pression results in east–west extension and rifting,
by overlapping mechanisms that can be summarized as          possibly coupled with slab rollback and detachment
follows: large-scale regional uplift, subsidence and         with associated isostatic uplift and asthenospheric
transcurrent processes, triggered by the evolution of        upwelling. Within this framework, comparisons between
the Tyrrhenian basin. Localized uplift and subsidence        MIS 5.5 and Holocene uplift indicators suggest a mean
are responsible for fault-bounded headlands and asso-        acceleration in uplift of about 100%.
ciated coastal plains.
                                                             Acknowledgments

6. Conclusions                                                  We thank journal reviewers Paul Hearty and Carlo
                                                             Bartolini for insightful advice which helped to clarify the
   In addition to compiling and evaluating all published     contents of this paper.
Tyrrhenian shoreline data for the Sicily region, we have
discovered and dated two important new Tyrrhenian            References
sections: a terrace outcrop at Taormina (with an ESR
age) and shoreline deposits at Cefalu` (with an AAR          Abate, B., Di Maggio, C., Incandela, A., Renda, P., 1991. Nuovi dati
age). A new continuous survey of the Tyrrhenian inner            sulla geologia della penisola di Capo San Vito (Sicilia NW).
margin has also been carried out over a distance of              Memorie Societa` Geologica Italiana 47, 15–25 (in Italian).
about 85 km between E S. Vito and Trapani, involving
re-measuring elevations and establishing error bars at       Abate, B., Ferruzza, G., Incandela, A., Renda, P., 1992. Ritrovamento
many sites. Overall, these data lead us to divide the            di depositi a Strombus bubonius. nell’isola di Favignana. Rivista
                                                                 Mineraria Siciliana 162, 37–46 (in Italian).
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16