Page 3 - 7843-9853-4-PB
P. 3

Probable root structures and associated trace fossils from the Lower Pleistocene calcarenites of Favignana Island, southern Italy...  747

troughs between bars, are common here. Foresets of larger            mazes or boxworks composed of tunnels of similar size (e.g.,
bedforms in all facies associations are steep, commonly              Ekdale, 1992).
avalanched, truncated by washouts and rip channels. These
features suggest storm-dominated sedimentation. Storm peri-                             Faviradixus robustus sp. nov.
ods were separated by fair-weather intervals, during which                                         (Figs. 3–6)
foresets were colonized by burrowing organisms, including
echinoids (Ślączka et al., 2011).                                        M a t e r i a l. – Holotype (Fig. 3A) – one specimen in the
                                                                     Dipartimento di Geologia, Universitŕ di Palermo. Moreover,
    The trace fossils studied occur in algal and rhodolithic         one specimen ING UJ 183P8a (paratype; Fig. 5) in the Geolog-
calcirudites arranged in cross-bedded units up to few metres         ical Museum of the Institute of Geological Sciences,
thick. Locally, medium bedded, homogeneous, medium-                  Jagiellonian University. Tens of observations were made in the
grained calcarenites enriched in pelitic material are present, as    field and documented by photographs.
well as coarsening-up strata, which are homogeneous in their
lower part and low-angle laminated in their uppermost part,              D e r i v a t i o n o f n a m e. – From robust – sturdy in
and topped by bioturbated calcirudites with lamination and           Latin, in reference to its large size.
muddy drapes. In some places, rhodolithic conglomerates crop
out in thick beds with erosive bases, which are massive or               D i a g n o s i s. – As for the ichnogenus.
crudely planar cross-bedded. Moreover, lenses of calcarenite             D e s c r i p t i o n. – Rarely branched, inclined to hori-
rich in mollusc shells, up to 1.5 m thick, which display crude       zontal, straight or slightly winding, tubular structures bounded
lamination in their lower parts and become more chaotic up-          by a “wall”. The structure is circular or elliptical in cross sec-
wards, can be found. These deposits were formed by landward          tion, 40–125 mm wide, traced for at least 250 cm, forming gal-
and seaward migrating subtidal dunes, which were influenced          leries. The “wall” is 4–16 mm thick. Its surface is smooth, cor-
by storms, rip currents and in some horizons, by tsunamis            rugated or rough or with holes, but without any ornamentation
(Ślączka et al., 2011).                                              pattern. It is composed of coarse calcarenite, without any selec-
                                                                     tion or arrangement of grains (Fig. 5B). The thickness of the
                       SYSTEMATIC PART                               “wall” is not uniform and changes around the perimeter of the
                                                                     structure. The lumen is commonly slightly off-centre (Fig. 3F).
    Two taxa of root structures, tentatively interpreted as such,        Branches are sparse, running horizontally or obliquely
root mats and three ichnotaxa of typical animal trace fossils have   down at an angle of 40–90°. They are of the same or smaller di-
been recognized. Some bioclasts from the localities studied con-     ameter (Fig. 3E). The inclination of the structural segments at-
tain invertebrate borings, which are not considered in this paper.   tains 30°. Dichotomous branches running obliquely down are
Even if many aspects of the probable root structures remain un-      also present (Figs. 3A and 4A). Locally, the tubes converge in a
solved, the reader may benefit from their descriptions.              bench composed of 5–6 tubes, or converge obliquely up to a
                                                                     central point above the recent ground surface (Fig. 3C). Very
                       Faviradixus gen. nov.                         rarely, patchy accumulations of the structures occur showing
                                                                     tubes running generally outwards (Fig. 3D). The branching
    D e r i v a t i o n o f n a m e. – From Favignana, the island    tubes may run very close to each other or miss on slightly dif-
of occurrence of the type species, and from radix (Latin) – root.    ferent levels, but never join again. They have a tendency to mu-
                                                                     tual avoidance. Only rarely cross-overs can be found, but they
    T y p e s p e c i e s. – Faviradixus robustus distinguished      probably derive from different systems. In one specimen, a
in this paper.                                                       “tube-in-tube” structure was found, where a smaller tube pene-
                                                                     trates along a larger tube in its upper part. The tubes penetrate
    D i a g n o s i s. – Mostly horizontal to oblique, sparsely      along foresets and descend up to 130 cm below the modern
branched, slightly winding tubular structure with a thick            ground surface (Fig. 3B).
“wall”, without swellings in the branched point and any evi-             The structure described co-occurs with horizontal to
dence of interconnections and interpenetrations.                     oblique and vertical galleries of the trace fossil Ophiomorpha
                                                                     nodosa Lundgren, 1891, with which there are cross-cutting re-
    R e m a r k s. – Faviradixus displays many similarities to       lationships (Figs. 4A). However, it was impossible to deter-
the trace fossil Rhizoichnus D’Alessandro and Iannone, 1982,         mine the order of cross-cutting, and the characteristic granu-
typified by Rhizoichnus firmus D’Alessandro and Iannone,             lated Ophiomorpha wall was not observed in the Faviradixus
1982, from the Pleistocene of southern Italy, mainly by its thick    lumen. In rare cases, it seems that the Ophiomorpha wall enters
“wall” and configuration of some segments. However, Rhizo-           the Faviradixus “wall”, but the latter may be of diagenetic ori-
ichnus displays a more sinuous and locally helicoidal course,        gin (see discussion of the species). Moreover, Ophiomorpha
and fine hair-like ducts present in the axial part. Moreover, it is  isp., Thalassinoides isp., and Beaconites isp. are present
smaller (10–30 mm), and its common feature is micritization.         (Fig. 4C) at the same locality.
                                                                         O c c u r r e n c e. – The most abundant occurrence is at site 1
    Faviradixus differs from Thalassinoides by convergence           at Punta Lunga (N37°55.0686’; E012°19.219’; ±4 m; Figs. 1 and
upwards of the tunnels, oblique dichotomous branching                6). A few specimens were observed at site 2 (N part of Punta
downwards, the smaller size of some branches, and a tendency         Lunga) and at site 3 (just N of the harbour in Favignana; Fig. 1).
to self avoidance. The differences point to side roots of a large
tree as a possible agent. On the contrary, Thalassinoides shows
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8