Page 8 - Bacc_Pagoto_&C_2015
P. 8

Author's personal copy

           Ann Microbiol (2015) 65:1–13                                                                      7

           Table 3 Diversity indices of
           samples from Faraglioni beach  Sample  Inverse  Shannon  Evenness  Beta     Richness  Chao1   Chao1
           after collapsing 16S rRNA gene        Simpson                      diversity                  error
           sequences to different taxonomic
           levels                    Class
                                      Shore-line  3.36     1.47     0.50      1.33     19        21.00   5.29
                                      Mid-line   3.02      1.40     0.47      1.26     20        21.00   3.40
                                      Upper-line  2.41     1.27     0.41      1.09     23        23.75   2.29
                                     Order
                                      Shore-line  6.19     2.11     0.55      1.26     47        54.20   9.02
                                      Mid-line   7.61      2.36     0.60      1.18     50        57.00   10.27
                                      Upper-line  6.37     2.17     0.54      1.04     57        62.25   8.28
                                     Family
                                      Shore-line  4.39     2.10     0.46      1.41     97        140.88  29.00
                                      Mid-line   5.34      2.34     0.50      1.31     104       147.88  29.00
                                      Upper-line  6.73     2.32     0.49      1.16     117       153.91  21.51
           The analysis is based on samples
                                     Genus
           from Faraglioni beach, after col-
                                      Shore-line  17.06    3.54     0.70      1.76     153       235.50  33.62
           lapsing 16S rRNA gene se-
           quences to different taxonomic  Mid-line  9.10  3.21     0.62      1.51     178       262.91  31.25
           levels. Unseen species are  Upper-line  6.51    2.53     0.47      1.24     218       598.00  153.90
           expressed as Chao1 index

           Bacterial phyla composition and sea-to-land differences  class Bacilli,order Bacillales (Fig. 2)and family Bacillaceae
           of Faraglioni beach                                (Fig. 4), which were abundant in the shore-line sample. For
                                                              Proteobacteria, shore-line and mid-line samples were more sim-
           The pattern of relative phyla abundance along the Y-axis are  ilar toeach other, contrarily to the pattern observed for the
           reported as a heat map in Fig. 3. The clustering of the heat map  overall phyla composition and for Firmicutes. Members of
           patterns indicated that at the phylum level upper-line and mid-  family Rhodobacteraceae were the most abundant and did
           line are more similar to each other, than to shore-line. The  not show high variability along the Y-axis. Other less abun-
           most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and  dant families were Alteromonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae,
           Bacteroidetes (Fig. 2). The most abundant classes were  Erythrobacteraceae,and Ectothiorhodospiraceae (Fig. 4).
           Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria,then follow-  Finally, to allow one to infer additionally potential functional
           ed by Flavobacteria and Actinobacteria (Fig. 2). Then, at the  activities related to the bacterial families detected, the most
           order level, Flavobacteriales, Actynomicetales, Rhizobiales,  abundant families for Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, namely
           Rhodobacterales, Bacillales, Alteromonadales, Chromatiales,  Bacillaceae, Alteromonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae,
           and Oceanospirillales were the most represented (Fig. 2).  Erythrobacteraceae,and Ectothiorhodospiraceae were investi-
             Different trends of abundance of phyla were detected along  gated collapsing reads at genus level. Observed relative genera
           the Y-axis (Fig. 3). In particular, Firmicutes and  abundances are reported in Fig. 5.For Bacillaceae,two main
           Proteobacteria presented increasing and decreasing trends,  genera were detected, Bacillus and Halobacillus.For
           respectively (Wilcoxon test p-value < 0.05), while  Alteromonadaceae, which were mainly found in shore-line sam-
           Actinobacteria showed lower abundance in the mid-line com-  ples and were practically absent in mid-line and upper-line
           pared to the other two samples (Wilcoxon test p-value<0.05).  samples, genus Marinobacter was the most abundant. Within
           Bacteroidetes did not show differences. The two phyla of  Rhodobacteraceae, ten main genera were represented, with
           Fusobacteria and Nitrospirae were excluded from the analy-  Sulfitobacter being the most abundant in upper-line samples.
           sis, since they have too few hits.                 For Erythrobacteraceae, the genus Erythrobacter was the most
                                                              represented, while for Ectothiorhodospiraceae, Thiohalospira
           Variability of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes along the Y-axis  was the most abundant genus.
           of Faraglioni beach

           Since Firmicutes and Proteobacteria showed a contrasting pro-  Discussion
           file, a more detailed taxonomic analysis was performed in these
           phyla down to the family level. For Firmicutes, most of the hits  The supralittoral belt is a highly dynamic transition zone between
           were due to members of the spore-forming aerobic bacteria of the  sea and land and is characterized by a sharp passage from a
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13