Page 10 - Bennett_DiFranco_alii2018

10 of 10 BENNETT ET AL.

performance of marine protected areas (MPAs). Marine Policy, 36, tions: A case study from Menabe, Madagascar. Ecological Eco-
414–422. nomics, 69, 1262–1271.
Lockwood, M. (2010). Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A Sorice, M. G., & Donlan, C. J. (2015). A human-centered framework for
framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Envi- innovation in conservation incentive programs. Ambio, 44, 788–792.
ronmental Management, 91, 754–766.
Svensson, P., Rodwell, L. D., & Attrill, M. J. (2010). The perceptions of
McClanahan, T. R., Cinner, J., Kamakuru, A. T., Abunge, C., & local fishermen towards a hotel managed marine reserve in Vietnam.
Ndagala, J. (2008). Management preferences, perceived benefits Ocean & Coastal Management, 53, 114–122.
and conflicts among resource users and managers in the Mafia Voyer, M., Gladstone, W., & Goodall, H. (2015). Obtaining a social
Island Marine Park, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation, 35, licence for MPAs—Influences on social acceptability. Marine Pol-
340–350. icy, 51, 260–266.
McNeill, A., Clifton, J., & Harvey, E. S. (2018). Attitudes to a marine Webb, E. L., Mailiao, R., & Siar, S. V. (2004). Using local user percep-
protected area are associated with perceived social impacts. Marine tions to evaluate outcomes of protected area management in the Sagay
Policy, 94, 106–118. Marine Reserve, Philippines. Environmental Conservation, 31, 138–
MedPAN. (2016). The 2016 status of marine protected areas in the 148.
Mediterranean—Main findings. MedPAN, UN Environment/MAP- Yasué, M., Kaufman, L., & Vincent, A. C. J. (2010). Assessing ecolog-
SPA/RAC.
ical changes in and around marine reserves using community per-
Morishige, Kanoeʻulalani, Andrade, P., Pascua, Puaʻala, Steward, K., ceptions and biological surveys. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and
Cadiz, E., Kapono, L., & Chong, U. (2018). N¯ a Kilo ʻ ¯ Aina: Visions Freshwater Ecosystems, 20, 407–418.
of Biocultural Restoration through Indigenous Relationships between Zafra-Calvo, N., Pascual, U., Brockington, D., Coolsaet, B.,
People and Place. Sustainability, 10, 3368. Cortes-Vazquez, J. A., Gross-Camp, N., … Burgess, N. D. (2017).
PISCO & UNS. (2016). The science of marine protected areas. Partner- Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in
ship for interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans and University protected areas. Biological Conservation, 211(Part A), 134–141.
of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statisti-
cal computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Austria.
Additional supporting information may be found online in the
Rohe, J. R., Aswani, S., Schlüter, A., & Ferse, S. C. A. (2017). Multi-
Supporting Information section at the end of the article.
ple drivers of local (non-) compliance in community-based marine
resource management: Case studies from the south pacific. Frontiers
in Marine Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00172.
Rönnbäck, P., Crona, B., & Ingwall, L. (2007). The return of ecosys- How to cite this article: Bennett NJ, Di Franco
tem goods and services in replanted mangrove forests: Perspectives A, Calò A, et al. Local support for conserva-
from local communities in Kenya. Environmental Conservation, 34,
tion is associated with perceptions of good gover-
313–324.
nance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness.
SAS. (2018). SAS software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Conservation Letters. 2019;e12640. https://doi.org/
Sommerville, M., Jones, J. P. G., Rahajaharison, M., & Milner- 10.1111/conl.12640
Gulland, E. J. (2010). The role of fairness and benefit distribution
in community-based Payment for Environmental Services interven-