Page 4 - Bracciali_2016
P. 4

C. Bracciali et al. / Marine Environmental Research 113 (2016) 116e123  119







































                                   Fig. 2. Representation of morphometric measurements on Chromis chromis (Dulcic, 2005).


          Table 2                                              size (small, <60.00 mm SL; medium, 60.00e64.95 mm SL; and
          Correlation values of each morphometric at standard length increase (SL).  large,  65.00 mm SL; see body condition results). In both cases,
                                                               body height-SL relationships were compared using the ANCOVA.
           Morphometrics-SL relationship
                                                               The relationships between each morphometric variable and the SL
           Morphometrics           R        N         P
                                                               were also tested by using the ANCOVA where the slope b was
           Head length (HL)        0.92     120       <0.0001  considered as the allometric coefficient. When there were no sig-
           Jaw length (JL)         0.61     120       <0.0001  nificant differences between slopes, the intercept a was used as
           Eye diameter (ED)       0.77     120       <0.0001
           Preocular distance (PreOD)  0.50  120      <0.0001  index of morphometric traits length at recruitment time at the
           Postocular distance (PostOD)  0.86  120    <0.0001  school. Lastly, a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was per-
           Dorsal fin length (DL)   0.96     120       <0.0001  formed as an ordination tool of morphometrical traits (Flury, 1988)
           Predorsal length (PreDL)  0.93   120       <0.0001  with respect to hydrodynamic conditions, after to have removed
           Pectoral fin length (PL)  0.89    120       <0.0001  the size effect (Elliott et al.,1995). To test if hydrodynamics can have
           Prepectoral length (PrePL)  0.93  120      <0.0001
           Ventral fin length (VL)  0.72     120       <0.0001  effect on morphometrics, a Permutational Multivariate Analysis of
           Preventral length (PreVL)  0.93  120       <0.0001  Variance (PERMANOVA) was used considering hydrodynamic
           Anal fin length (AL)     0.86     120       <0.0001  condition as a fixed factor (HYDRO; 2 levels; high vs. low). The log-
           Preanal length (PreAL)  0.96     120       <0.0001  transformed matrix of sixteen morphometrical variables was used
           Body height (BH)        0.81     120       <0.0001
           Peduncle height (PH)x   0.95     120       <0.0001  to estimate the Euclidean distances, all p-values were calculated
                                                               using 9999 permutations of the residuals under a reduced model
                                                               (Anderson, 2001). STATISTICA rel. 10.0 software (StatSoft Inc., USA)
                                                               was used to perform ANOVAs and PCAs.
          Table 3
          Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc comparison test results of the BCI analysis. SLc ¼ SL
          class; LOW ¼ LOW-HYDRO site of Cammello Bay; HIGH ¼ HIGH-HYDRO site of Punta
          Bassana.                                             3. Results
           SLc      Site  LOW  LOW  LOW  LOW  LOW  LOW  LOW
                                                                  The total damselfish captured were 1368 and 1569 in LOW- and
           <50.00   HIGH  ***                                  HIGH-HYDRO sites, respectively. Lengths (SL) and weights (TW)
           50.00e54.95  HIGH   ***
           55.00e59.95  HIGH        ***                        were highly correlated at both sites (Fig. 3), with the length-weight
           60.00e64.95  HIGH             ns                    regression slopes significantly lower in the LOW-HYDRO than in
           65.00e69.95  HIGH                  **               the HIGH-HYDRO sites (2.78 vs. 3.36; ANCOVA, F 1,2935 ¼ 153.01,
           70.00e74.95  HIGH                       ***         P < 0.05 [***]). The growth coefficient (the slope b of the Age-SL
           >75.00   HIGH                                ns
                                                               relationship) was not different between LOW- and HIGH-HYDRO
                                                               fish (ANCOVA, F 1,370 ¼ 0.17, P > 0.05 [ns], Fig. 4). Instead, the
                                                               intercept a was significantly greater for individuals living in HIGH-
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8