Page 3 - DNAfromhistorical
P. 3

Gubili et al.: DNA from white shark historical samples                        235

  In this study, we report on the first attempt to            tine was placed in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube.
extract and amplify mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of              Osteodentine from each tooth (averaging 0.12 g) was
a series of small overlapping contiguous sequences            initially washed, and subsequently crushed to pow-
(Fulton & Stiller 2012) from the osteodentine of              der on a Spex 6750 freezer mill (Spex SamplePrep).
contemporary white shark teeth from South Africa.
We have also used this method to recover se-                    Fragments (0.10 to 0.25 g) of historical tissue and
quences from dried skin and jaw cartilage of Medi-            jaw cartilage from Mediterranean, Atlantic and Pa-
terranean and Pacific Ocean white sharks collected            cific Ocean white sharks were rehydrated for 24 h in
34 to 129 yr ago. This resource was used to test              1× TE buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA) to re-
whether the prevailing Pacific origin hypothesis              duce aerosol contamination and increase rate of di-
(Gubili et al. 2011) of Mediterranean white sharks            gestion. A standard phenol extraction protocol (Sam-
can be refuted by sequencing the D-loop of more               brook et al. 1989) was employed to obtain genomic
individuals.                                                  DNA from all samples, modified by an additional
                                                              40 µl of Proteinase K added prior to final overnight
               MATERIALS AND METHODS                          incubation (55°C). Finclip DNA extractions for verifi-
                                                              cation of tooth-derived sequences from contempo-
    Sample preparation and extraction protocols               rary SA individuals were performed in a different
                                                              laboratory.
  Jaw samples and small pieces of fins were taken
from 3 individuals caught in beach protection nets                                Contamination controls
(Cliff et al. 1989) at different locations along the east
coast of South Africa (SA; KwaZulu-Natal) between               Stringent measures employed in successful ancient/
2004 and 2005 (Table 1). In addition, we assembled a          historical DNA projects (Valentine et al. 2008,
collection of museum jaw cartilage and uncurated,             McMenamin & Hadly 2012) were instigated to elimi-
dried tissue samples from 7 white sharks collected 33         nate contamination risks. All DNA extractions, in-
to 128 yr ago from the Mediterranean Sea and                  cluding those from teeth, took place in laboratories
Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (Table 1).                        free of contemporary shark material, and separate
                                                              tools were designated for use on historical tissue and
  Teeth (n = 3–4) from each of the South African jaws         cleaned with 25% sodium hypochlorite solution be-
were detached, cleaned, and washed overnight with             tween samples. Three tissue extractions were per-
Virkon (Day-Impex Limited). After drying, teeth               formed for each sample, with the addition of a nega-
were cut by a rotary power tool (FMTC 140HTK, Per-            tive control consisting of only reaction reagents. PCR
formance TM). Tool, cutting parts, surfaces, and vice         took place in a separate DNA-free location and in-
were washed with 70% ethanol and 10% sodium                   cluded 2 negative controls. Replicate amplifications
hydroxide. Enamel was removed, and the osteoden-              (n = 3–5) were performed for each sample, of which 2

Table 1. Carcharodon carcharias. Details of each sampled South African white shark (supplied by the KwaZulu-Natal Sharks
Board), and historical material (obtained from museum and private collections). Tissue type used in analysis is also provided.
Haplotype refers to the 749 bp partial mitochondrial DNA D-loop sequence haplotype referred to in Fig. 2. F: female; M: male;

                                                                    TL: total length; −: unknown

Sample ID Capture date Capture location                    Sex TL (mm) Mass (kg) Tissue type   Haplotype

Contemporary samples  Durban, South Africa                 F  2210   100 Teeth & finclip       −
DUR04039 4 Nov 2004   Richards Bay, South Africa           M  2598   170 Teeth & finclip       −
RB05086 24 Oct 2005   Ispingo, South Africa                M  2570   134 Teeth & finclip       −
ISP05004 8 Sep 2005
                                                                 −
Historical samples                                               −
                                                              ~6000
GWMD3 1 May 1900 Atlantic                                  −     −   − Jaw cartilage           −
                                                                 −
GWMD10 1885           Port Jackson, NSW, Australia M             −   − Chondocranium           H20
                                                                 −
GWMD11 10 Dec 1891 Liguria, Monterosso, Italy              F         − Jaw cartilage           H24

GWMD12 1900           Toscana, Lucca, Viareggio, Italy F             − Finclip, full specimen  H1

GWMD20 29 May 1953 Tunara, Favignana, Italy                F         − Dried fin, trophy board H2

GWMD21 4 Apr 1980 Tunara, Favignana, Italy                 F         − Dried fin, trophy board H2

GWMD15  −             Palermo, Sicily, Italy               −         − Jaw cartilage           H2
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8