Page 5 - DNAfromhistorical
P. 5

Gubili et al.: DNA from white shark historical samples  237

cluding 4 contemporary Mediterranean sequences          primer sets. D-loop2 was initially used on historical
(HQ540294 to HQ540296,Gubili et al. 2011; JF715925)     material, but discarded due to the poor quality of the
and 91 sequences from worldwide locations               sequence produced. No correlations between the age
(AY026196 to AY026224, Pardini et al. 2001; GU00        of sample and semi-nested PCR success rate were
2302 to GU002321, Jorgensen et al. 2010; HQ414073       detected for each primer pair (R = −0.356 to 0.373).
to HQ414086, Blower et al. 2012; KC914387, Chang et     All forward and reverse sequences were identical
al. 2014; KC511601 to KC511626). These specifically     and confirmed as Carcharodon carcharias by BLAST
included sequences from proximal populations (such      searches. Low-quality amplification for the D-loop4
as South Africa and North West Atlantic) which may      amplicon from the historical Atlantic sample (GW
be considered as potential source populations for the   MD3) meant it was excluded from the final analysis.
Mediterranean. Base pair positions with gaps/missing    However, when a smaller segment (510 bp) of se-
data were excluded from analysis. Haplotypes, haplo-    quence was analysed, this sample displayed a unique
typic diversity, and average pairwise sequence differ-  haplotype found within the Atlantic/South African
ences were obtained using DnaSP 5.10.1 (Librado &       grouping (data not shown). Assembled contigs from
Rozas 2009). A haplotype genealogy was constructed      each of 6 remaining historical samples produced in
in HAPVIEW following the method of Salzburger et        each case a 749 bp partial sequence of the mtDNA
al. (2011) using a phylogenetic tree derived in PhyML   control region (Fig. 1).
v3.0 (Guindon & Gascuel 2003, Guindon et al. 2010)
following 10 000 bootstraps using GTR+G+I as the          The historic samples were aligned to the 96
evolutionary model inferred by JMODELTEST               known contemporary white shark mtDNA se-
(Posada 2008).                                          quences available in GenBank, revealing 88 poly-
                                                        morphic sites distinguishing 55 different haplo-
                              RESULTS                   types. These haplotypes were assembled into a
                                                        network with 2 main lineages separated by a mini-
     DNA amplification from contemporary teeth          mum of 30 nucleotide substitutions: one lineage
                                                        was composed mainly of North West Atlantic and
  D-loop PCR products were recovered for each           South African sequences, while the other included
SA individual, although not all amplifications were     all Pacific haplotypes (Fig. 2). Contemporary Medi-
equally successful. All sets of primers yielded a       terranean samples (n = 4; GenBank HQ540294 to
PCR product of the expected size in at least 1 indi-    HQ540296, Gubili et al. 2011; JF715925) exhibited
vidual. PCR using primer sets D-loop1, D-loop2,         a single haplotype (H2), shared with 3 historical
and D-loop4 yielded a product of the expected size      Mediterranean samples (GWMD15, 20, and 21;
in all samples (100%). Larger fragments produced        Fig. 2). Two additional historical Mediterranean
by D-loop3 (286 base pairs [bp]) and D-loop5            haplotypes (H1, GWMD12, Toscana, Italy; H24,
(245 bp) primers were successful in only 1 (Durban)     GWMD11, Monterosso, Italy) were identified from
in 3 samples (33.33%), indicating that amplification    single individuals. Mediterranean haplotypes show-
success is dependent upon size of the target frag-      ed little differentiation from those of Pacific sharks;
ment due to the poor quality of template DNA (p <       for example, only 3 mutational steps separate the
0.05; X227 = 40.4). When aligned, the 5 overlapping     common Mediterranean haplotype (H2) from the
sequences amounted to 874 bp (from Position 268         Northeast Pacific/Australia/New Zealand (H19)
to 1142) of the D-loop. Sequences obtained from         haplotype, and 6 steps separate it from the South-
tooth samples were identical to those generated         west Pacific (Taiwan) haplotype (H6) (Fig. 2). The
from the fin tissues.                                   newly described historical Mediterranean haplotype
                                                        H24 was separated from the common Mediterran-
    MtDNA amplification from historical material        ean haplotype (H2) by only 3 mutational steps, and
                                                        from Northeast Pacific/Australia/New Zealand
  DNA was extracted from 7 historical samples           (H19) and Southwest Pacific (Taiwan) haplotypes
(Table 1). The semi-nested PCR protocol was 74%         (H6) by 4 steps and 7 steps, respectively (Fig. 2).
successful across all amplicons, improving on the       However, the historical Mediterranean haplotype
much lower success rate (26%) and poor repro-           H1, while separated by 6 mutational steps from the
ducibility of non-nested reactions across all D-loop    common Mediterranean haplotype H2, was only 2
                                                        steps removed from contemporary Australian/New
                                                        Zealand sequences (H9); placing it firmly with
                                                        contemporary Pacific haplotypes. Estimates of ave-
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9