Page 10 - Isozyme_analysis_of_genetic_diversity2004
P. 10

146

               Von Bothmer R., Gustafsson M. and Snogerup S. 1995. Brassica  Kianian S.F. and Quiros C.F. 1992. Trait inheritance, fertility, and
                 sect. Brassica (Brassicaceae) II. Inter- and intraspecific crosses  genomic relationships of some n 5 9 Brassica species. Genet.
                 with cultivars of B. oleracea. Genetic Resources and Crop  Resour. Crop Evol. 39: 165–175.
                 Evolution 42: 165–178.                        Lamboy W.F., Mcferson J.R., Westmann A.L. and Kresovich S.
               Brown A.D.H. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations.  1994. Application of isozyme data to the management of the
                 Theor. Pop. Biol. 15: 1–42.                     United States national Brassica oleracea. L. genetic resources
               Chevre A.M., Delourme R., Eber F., Margale E., Quiros C. and  collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 41: 99–108.
                 `
                 Arus P. 1995. Genetic analysis and nomenclature for seven  Lanner-Herrera C., Gustafsson M., Falt A-S and Bryngelsson T.
                 isozyme systems in Brassica nigra, B. oleracea, and B. campes-  1996. Diversity in natural populations of wild Brassica oleracea
                 tris. Plant Breeding 114: 473–480.              as estimated by isozyme and RAPD analysis. Genet. Resour.
               Diederichsen A., 2001. Brassica L. In: Hanelt, P. and Institute of  Crop Evol. 43: 13–23.
                 Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (eds), Mansfelds En-  Lazaro A. and Aguinagalde I. 1998a. Genetic diversity in Brassica
                 cyclopedia of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. Springer  oleracea L. (Cruciferae) and Wild Relatives (2n 5 18) using
                 Berlin - Heidelberg.                            isozymes. Annals of Botany 82: 821–828.
               Felsenstein J. 1993. PHYLIP (PHYlogenetic Inference Package)  Lazaro A. and Aguinagalde I. 1998b. Genetic diversity in Brassica
                 version 3.5 c distributed by the author. Departement of Genetics,  oleracea L. (Cruciferae) and Wild Relatives (2n 5 18) using
                 University of Washington, Seattle/WA.           RAPD Markers. Annals of Botany 82: 829–833.
               Gemmill C.E., Ranker T.A., Ragone D., Perlman S.P. and Wood  Loo A.H.B., Tan H.T.W., Kumar P.P and Saw L.G. 1999. Popula-
                 K.R. 1998. Conservation genetics of endangered endemic  tion analysis of Licuala glabra Griff. var. glabra (Palmae) using
                 Hawaiian genus Brighamia (Campanulaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85:  RAPD profiling. Annals of Botany 84: 421–427.
                 528–539.                                      Loveless M.D and Hamrick J.L. 1984. Ecological determinants of
                                             `
               Geraci A., Divaret I., Raimondo F.M. and Chevre A.M. 2001. Use  genetic structure in plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:
                 of RAPD markers to investigate the genetic relationships be-  65–95.
                                                                          ´
                 tween Sicilian wild populations of Brassica. Plant Breeding 120:  Martı ´n C., Gonzales-Benito M.E. and Iriondo J.M. 1997. Genetic
                 193–196.                                        diversity within and among populations of a threatened species:
                                                      ´
               Gillies A.C.M., Cornelius J.P., Newton A.C., Navaro C., Hernandez  Erodium Paularense Fern. Gonz. and Izco. Molecular Ecology 6:
                 M. and Wilson J. 1997. Genetic variation in Costa Rican  813–820.
                 populationsof the tropical timber species Cedrela odorata L.  Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Natu-
                 assessed using RAPDs. Molecular Ecology 6: 1133–1145.  ralist. 106: 283–292.
               Gladis Th. and Hammer K. 2001. Nomenclatural notes on the  Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.
                 Brassica oleracea - group. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48: 7–11.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321–3323.
                ´
               Gomez-Campo C. 1980. Morphology and morphotaxonomy of the  Raimondo F.M. 1997a. Les membres italiens du complex Brassica
                                                                                         ´´ ecologiques. Bocconea
                 tribe Brassiceae. In: Tsunoda S., Hinata K. and Gomez–Campo  oleracea: Leur distribution et specifites
                 C. (eds), Brassica Crops and Wild Allies. Biology and Breeding.  7: 103–106.
                 Japan Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, pp. 3–31.  Raimondo F.M., Gianguzzi L. and Ilardi V. 1994. Inventario delle
                ´
               Gomez-Campo C. and Gustafsson M. 1995. Prospect for in situ  specie ‘‘a rischio’’ nella flora vascolare nativa della Sicilia.
                 conservation of Brassica oleracea wild relatives In: Gass T.,  Quad. Bot. Ambientale Appl. 3: 65–132.
                 Gustafsson M., Astley D. and Frison E. (compilers), Report of a  Raimondo F.M., Mazzola P. and Ottonello D. 1991. On the tax-
                 working group on Brassica (second meeting, 13–15 November  onomy and distribution of Brassica sect. Brassica (Cruciferae)
                 1994, Lisbon, Portugal). pp. 72–74. European Cooperative Pro-  in Sicily. Fl. Medit. 1: 63–86.
                 gramme for Crop Genetic Resources Networks (ECP/GR). Inter-  Raimondo F.M. and Mazzola P. 1997. A new taxonomic arrange-
                 national Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.  ment of the sicilian members of Brassica sect. Brassica. Lagas-
               Gomez-Campo C. 1999. Biology of Brassica Coenospecies.  calia 19: 831–838.
                ´
                 Elsevier.                                     Snogerup S., Gustafsson M. and Von Bothmer R. 1990. Brassica
               Hamrick J.L. 1990. Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure  sect. Brassica (Brassicaceae) I Taxonomy and variation. Will-
                 in plant populations. In: Soltis D.E. and Soltis P. (eds), Isozymes  denowia 19: 271–365.
                 in Plant Biology. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.  Swofford D.L. and Selander R.B. 1989. BIOSYS-1. Release 1.7.
               Hamrick J.L., Linhart Y.B. and Mitton J.B. 1979. Relationships  Illinois Natural History Survey, Champagne, IL.
                 between life history characteristics and electrophoretically–de-  Vallejos C.E. 1983. Enzyme activity staining. In: Tanksley S.D. and
                 tectable genetic variation in plant. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:  Orton T.J. (eds), Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Part
                 173–200.                                        A. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 469–516.
                                                                                                      ´
               Harberd D.J. 1972. A contribution to the cyto-taxonomy of Bras-  Watanabe M. and Hinata K. 1999. Self-Incompatibility. In: Gomez-
                 sica (Cruciferae) and its allies. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 1–23.  Campo C. (ed.), Biology of Brassica Coenospecies. Elsevier, pp.
               Huenneke L.F. 1991. Ecological implications of genetic variation  149–183.
                 in plant populations. In: Falk D.A. and Holsinger K.E. (eds),  Wendel J.F. and Stuber C.F. 1984. Plant isozymes: Enzymes
                 Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University  studied and buffer systems for their electrophoretic resolution in
                 Press, New York.                                starch gels. Isozyme Bull. 17: 4–11.
               Kephart S.R. 1990. Starch gel electrophoresis of plant isozymes: a  Wright S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations. Annals of
                 comparative analysis of techniques. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 693–712.  Eugenics 15: 323–354.
   5   6   7   8   9   10