Page 120 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 120

Through a Foucauldian framework I further my analysis of sustainability as a discourse, and

               suggest that the four-pillar model of sustainability has its origins in the natural sciences and


               the disciplinary divides of the enlightenment period. I turn attention to marine sustainability


               and  the  development  of  marine  science  knowledge  and  institutions.  This  will  be  an

               opportunity  to  further  think  through  the  relationship  between  biodiversity  and  cultural

               diversity  discourses.  As  I  have  suggested,  a  discourse  of  cultural  diversity  in  sustainable


               development incorporates the language and conceptual framing of biodiversity. In the next

               chapter I analyse the relationship of sustainability to the history of the natural sciences and


               formations of disciplinary areas of expertise. I introduce the idea of environmental ordering

               and  explore  the  emergence  of  such  terms  as  ecosystem  biodiversity,  species,  as  well  as


               Maximum  Sustainable  Yield  (MSY)  in  fishery  management.  I  consider  how  marine

               sustainability  discourses  are  enacted  in  specific  institutions,  through  markets,  calculative

               devices  and  modes  of  governance.  I  develop  an  analysis  of  the  cultural  dimensions  of


               sustainability  projects  and  argue  that  even  those  projects  that  are  clearly  aligned  with

               environmentalism and focused solely on the sustainability of a species (that is, not based on a


               four-pillar  model),  have  cultural  dimensions.  There  are  cultural  dimensions  in  the  very

               knowledge  framework  that  inform,  identify  and  measure  environmental  sustainability.  By


               undertaking  this  work  I  continue  to  build  a  framework  of  sustainability  as  a  global

               assemblage, which at times   incorporates   an   integrated   sustainability   discourse   (four-


               pillar  model)  mobilising  concepts  related  to  cultural  diversity,  while  at  other  times  is

               constructed through a biological discourse, grounded in enduring disciplinary divides of the


               natural and social sciences. In doing so, I begin to develop a framework that deepens our

               understanding  of  the  term  sustainability,  and  cultures  of  marine  sustainability,  as  well  as


               addresses the challenge of defining and sustaining fishing cultures.









                                                                                                      108
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125