Page 122 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 122

and ideas upon which sustainability is based flow through institutional settings. For example,

               AMCS draws on information from the Australian government data, the Redlist of Threatened


               Species, and most likely the FAO, since FAO is the global body which gathers information


               on fisheries worldwide. FAO collate data, assess that data and set standards for fishing, which

               are the basis for many sustainability programs. There are also numerous regional bodies such

               as  ICCAT,  which  collect  and  measure  data  and  set  specific  fishery  quota  based  on  stock


               assessment.  These  practices  are  grounded  in  the  notion  of  a  baseline,  which  as  marine

               biologist Daniel Pauly (1995) points out is always a shifting baseline, leading to the setting of

                                        45
               new  sustainability  norms .  Sustainability  materialises  in  the  form  of  devices  such  as  the

               Australia’s Sustainable Seafood Guide app or a fish-tag used to track and collect data on the


               stock. These devices differ in their user contexts (i.e. consumers as opposed to scientists and

               fishing  industry)  but  nonetheless  function  within  the  same  sustainability  assemblage.

               Sustainability  manifests  in  fishery  policy  and  UN  documents  through  terms  such  as


               “maximum sustainable yield”, “sustainable catch” and “sustainable management”. As I will

               cover in the next chapter, sustainability has local articulations in fishing communities and it


               can  be  a  point  of  conflict  among  diverse  groups,  involving  diverse  concerns  and  ways  of

               caring.


                       Sustainability is what Raymond Williams would call a “keyword”: a site of struggle,

               where meaning is not arbitrary nor is it ahistorical (1983). Keywords are contested terms,


               loaded with values and deeply connected to a cultural context (Williams 1983, p. 22). Yet for

               Williams (1983, p.22) language does not simply reflect a cultural context, rather:



                        …social and historical processes occur within language, in ways which indicate
                        how integral the problem of meanings and of relationships really are. New kinds
                        of  relationships,  but  also  new  ways  of  seeing  existing  relationships,  appear  in
                        language  in  a  variety  of  ways:  the  invention  of  new  terms  (capitalism);  in  the
                        adaptation  and  alteration  (indeed  at  times  reversal)  of  older  terms  (society  or
                        individual); in extension (interest) or transfer (exploitation).






                                                                                                      110
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127