Page 2 - Scuderi_Balistreri_Germanà_2019
P. 2

416                                 DANILO SCUDERI ET ALII




                 still unknown species or the earliest reported lessep-  As a consequence, a molecular phylogenetic ap-
                 sian species, as it was. Subsequently the species  proach was used by some researchers but the results
                 was doubtfully described as new as Meleagrina  were  still  discordant:  see  for  instances  Temkin
                 savignyi Monterosato, 1884 (Bivalvia Pteriidae),  (2010) and Cunha et al. (2011).
                 later identified as Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814)  For this reasons, the former Author stated the lack-
                 (Parenzan,  1961;  Bombace,  1967;  Paccagnella,  ing to date of precise constant morphological charac-
                 1967; Spada, 1969).                          ters, in particular to discriminate species of the so
                   Since modern times, this latter name has never  called “P. radiata” group, for which three different
                 been questioned and nobody has ever doubted if  clines have been distinguished and taxonomically re-
                 under this name more than one species could be  lated by him to geographical sub-species: P. imbricata
                 hidden.                                      imbricata Röding, 1798 in the western Atlantic areas,
                   Taxonomy of the species of Pinctada Röding,  P. imbricata radiata in the eastern Indian Ocean and
                 1798 is complicated because of the extreme vari-  the Red Sea areas and P. imbricata fucata in the Indo-
                 ability of species in this genus and seems far to be  Pacific areas.
                 clearly defined. In fact P. radiata has been consid-  As the modes of introduction of this pearl oyster
                 ered as conspecific with P. fucata (Gould, 1850) (see  in the Mediterranean Sea, more than one have been
                 Hynd, 1955) and, later on, as mere synonyms (Ran-  described in the literature: intentional introduction
                 son, 1961) (“alternate representation” in WoRMS).   by mariculture; shipping, which is considered to
                   Some important factors, like wide geographical  be the most likely introduction vector of non-in-
                 distribution and anthropic contribution to hybridiza-  digenous species (Zibrowius, 1992) and even by
                 tion, are reported by Temkin (2010) as affecting the  migrant trips of the sea turtle Caretta caretta (Lin-
                 extreme polymorphism of species.             naeus, 1758) (Oliverio et al., 1992).









































                            Figure 1. Map of the sampled area: red circles refer to P. radiata findings, yellow circles to
                                        P. fucata findings. The “?” refers to doubtful provenance.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7