Page 8 - Soldatini2014
P. 8

Local and Global Climate Effects on Storm Petrel Demography

Table 8. Percentage of variance expressed by each principal              geolocators or satellite tracking devices are not small enough to be
component factor of the PCAs performed (Alboran Sea,                     used on this species. The trends of sea surface temperature and
Balearic Sea, Sicilian Channel, Adriatic Sea, and Aegean Sea: Al,        chlorophyll [39] (figure S4a) may influence storm petrel survival.
L, S, Ad, Ae, respectively; sea surface temperature: SST and             In particular, the conditions in the Alboran Sea zone resulted to be
chlorophyll: CHL).                                                       influencing adult survival. Considering sea surface temperature
                                                                         and chlorophyll concentration effects separately, we observed that
ext cov                                % cov                             SST has a stronger direct effect while the CHL direct effect is
                                                                         weaker (Table 9). It is still unknown what the Mediterranean storm
LsstPC1                                70.069                            petrel feeds on during winter. Our results suggest that they
LchlPC1                                44.937                            probably feed mainly on small fishes, not directly affected by CHL,
LchlPC2                                29.623                            as during the breeding period [27], and not on zooplankton that
AlsstPC1                               82.34                             would be directly affected by CHL concentration. Sea conditions
AlchlPC1                               86.231                            may induce birds to skip reproduction in years with high surface
AdsstPC1                               87.756                            temperatures and low chlorophyll levels at wintering sites, resulting
AdchlPC1                               51.557                            in lower encounter rates during the subsequent breeding season.
AdchlPC2                               29.163                            This would explain the drops in encounter rate observed in
SsstPC1                                88.377                            breeding seasons after high sea surface temperature and low
SchlPC1                                78.176                            chlorophyll concentration in winter conditions (figure S4a and b).
AesstPC1                               88.872                            Our results highlighted the relationship between environmental
AechlPC1                               92.015                            covariates and encounter rates, as also found in the Pacific and
                                                                         other studies on impacts of climate change on avian populations
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094526.t008                                    [11,54].

will not have a negative effect on juvenile survival rate of the            Finally with respect to predicted features of climate change [51],
Mediterranean subspecies.                                                as we observed that colony region conditions affect chick and adult
                                                                         survival, whereas conditions in the wintering areas affected adult
   Adult survival was directly affected by the climatic conditions at    survival, we can conclude that the stability of the Alboran sea
the time of breeding due to the adult’s needs to meet its own            surface temperature due to anticyclonic systems [55] may result in
energetic requirements as well as those of the chick. Males tend to      continuous upwelling in the area thus resulting in stability of
recruit earlier than females and recruitment was reduced in years        survival of adult storm petrels during winter while the anticipated
with adverse prebreeding conditions, suggesting that younger birds       decrease in precipitation and warmer summers [20] will positively
decided to delay recruitment to wait for better condition or more        affect chick survival. Although we did not consider climatic effects
productive years. Carryover effects for the winter might occur as a      on the food chain our result suggest future demographic stability
consequence [52]. It is noteworthy the fact that males of                and an improvement of the species status. Further research on
Mediterranean storm petrels are smaller than females [53] and            climate change effects on the food chain and consequent effects on
consequently adults may rear the chicks with fewer energy                the Mediterranean storm petrel are currently missing and would
expenditure.                                                             help to forecast the species future conditions.

Identification of wintering-area                                         Supporting Information
   The original aspect of our study is the use of statistical models to
                                                                         Figure S1 Colony and meteorological stations location.
identify seabird wintering areas, as illustrated for the storm petrel,   (TIF)
a species difficult to follow at sea due to lack of technology, as
                                                                         Figure S2 Correlation graphs for principal component
                                                                         analysis (PCA) for building integrative climatic indices.
                                                                         a) PCA of West Sicily rainfall data; b) PCA of the pre-breeding

Table 9. Model selection results.

Model       Deviance                           NP AIC                    DAIC   AIC weight

time eff    4125.67                            24 4173.67                0.00   0.664
Al sst chl  4145.01                            15 4175.04                1.37   0.335
Al sst      4145.01                            15 4175.04                1.37   0.335
Al chl      4156.74                            15 4183.76                10.09  0.001
L sst chl   4155.86                            15 4185.86                12.19  0.001
Ad sst chl  4161.70                            15 4191.70                18.03  0.000
Ae sst chl  4167.40                            15 4197.40                23.73  0.000
S sst chl   4170.41                            15 4200.41                26.74  0.000
Constant    4175.93                            14 4203.93                30.26  0.000

Environmental, ‘‘time’’, and constant effects ‘‘i’’ were considered on survival, W, with climatic covariates in 5 areas of the Mediterranean (Al: Alboran, L: Balearic, Ad:
Adriatic, Ae: Aegean, S: Sicilian Sea). Deviance (Deviance), number of parameters (NP), DAIC and AIC weight are reported.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094526.t009

PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org                                               8 April 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 4 | e94526
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10