Page 6 - Zapparoli_2007
P. 6

25. Maiella (Mai): between the valley of the Pescara River to the north, the
              valley of the Gizio River to the west, and the valley of the Sangro River to the
              south; Morrone Mountain was also included in this sector.


                Hilly Adriatic sector
                26. Hills of the Adriatic site, induding Conero Mountain (Adr): from the
              valley of the Foglia River to the north to the valley of the Fortore River to the
              south, from the eastern slopes of the orientai Apennines chains  (Umbrian-
              Marchigian Apennines,  Sibillini and Laga Mountains,  the Gran Sasso,  and
              Maiella) to the Adriatic sea coast.

              RESULTS

              Faunistic analysis

                In the studied area 67 species of centipedes were found:  l Scutigeromorpha,
              31  Lithobiomorpha, 8 Scolopendromorpha, and 27 Geophilomorpha. Two
              species were introduced (Lamyctes emarginatus, Lithobius peregrinus), and three
              are of uncertain taxonomic status (Lithobius  biporus,  Schendyla aternana,  S.
              viridis). The geophilomorph schendylid Schendyla armata (Brolemann, 1901)
              recorded in Lazio  for  the fìrst  time  (province of Viterbo,  surroundings of
              Tuscania,  Quercus suber forest,  42°25'29" N,  11 o54'20"  E,  13.IV.2006, S.
              Pieri leg.,  l specimen, M. Zapparoli det., collection M. Zapparoli) must to be
              added  to  the  67  species  already  reported  in  Zapparoli  (2006a)  except
              Stenotaenia linearis C.L. Koch, 1835 (= Geophilus linearis C.L. Koch, 1835 not
              present in Centrai Italy according to Bonato and Minelli (2008). The list of
              species, each with the geographic sectors in which it is found and its assigned
              chorotype indicated, is reported in T ab. I.
                Overall there is a relatively rich centipede fauna in the studied area, whose num-
              ber of species corresponds to 41.9% of those reported in Italy (160; Zapparoli
              an d Minelli, 2006) an d to 13.8% of those present in Europe ( 486; Zapparoli an d
              Minelli, 2006). Such richness also emerge from comparisons with other areas that
              differ in their geographic extension, environmental heterogeneity and degree of
              fa unisti c knowledge, both Apenninic, like Ligurian Apennines, T uscan-Emilian
              Apennines, the southern Apennines, with 50-60 species ( Chelazzi, 1970; Minelli
              and Zapparoli, 1985; Zapparoli, 1986; Zapparoli and Minelli, 2006), and Alpine,
              like the south-eastern Alps and 't:he western Alps, both with 76 species, and the
              Ligurian Alps, with 52 species  (Minelli and Zapparoli,  1985,  1992; Zapparoli,
              1989; Minelli, 1991). Moreover, the number of reported species is higher than
              that of Sardinia and Sicily (49 and 47 respectively:  Foddai et al.,  1995,  1996;
              Zapparoli and Minelli, 2006).



              304
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11