Page 5 - TonarelliTurgutcan1992
P. 5

The bases of the silt horizons often show          Tyrrhenian margin of Sicily and the Sardinian
small-scale irregularities produced by compaction.
These have a relief no greater than 0.7 cm and                cha nnel.
show no directional or slope component. They                             The sediments of the west-central Matta

appear to have been produced by in-situ                       Plateau have a more pelagic character, remarkably
                                                              similar to that of the deep water Pantelleria basin.
compaction rather than by bed traction. Thus we               There is only a hint of local shelly sediments along
find no direct evidence of sediment mass
movements along the seabed causing erosive or                 the eastern, more shallow and rocky ridge of the
traction features. lt is possible that because of the         eastern Malta Plateau that forms a bathymetric
high salinity of the Mediterranean bottom water,              high between southern Sicily and Malta (Max et al.,
that sediment slumps derived from the basin                   this vo l.), but the African carbonate shelf
marg ins form sediment sheets for substantial                 environment does not seem to be fully developed
d istances within the water column, before settling
out. Th e presence of common non-directional                  on the Malta Plateau, even where water depths
convolution within the more fine-grained fraction
indicates that these sediments had a very surface-            are shallow.
layer high porosity al th eir initial deposition, and                    Sediments of the centrai Pantelleria Basin
have largely compacted without substantial lateral
movement.                                                     appear to be typical ot deep water sediments in

                         Conclusions                          the incised basins of the Sicilian-Tunisian Platform
           The shallow water Adventure and                    (Colantoni et al., this vol.). They are characterized
Lampedusa Banks occupy the same sedimentary
province, even though they are separated by the               by fine-gra ined sediments of a pelagic detrital
deeper water channel of the Strait of Sicily. The             character, and have been largely redeposited in
Adventure Bank thus comprises the northernmost                the basins owing to local slump activity along basin
part of the true African carbonate shelf margin               margins. Even though they are very dose to
(IBCM, 1987, 1990). The shelf immediately to the
north of the Adventure Bank between the Egadi                 active sediment provinces, only a very small
ls!an.d.s. and western Sicily has more rocky texture          fraction of their total sediment budget has been
(Colantoni et al., this vol.) and a different range of        derived from shallow water sources.
sediments, that form a transitional depositional
zone with the less calca reous sediments of the                          Thus, fine-grained carbonate detritus
                                                              either entering the water by a eolean means or
                                                              settling from dead carbonate-skeletal micro-
                                                              organisms ...:ithin the water mass, appear to

                                                              contribute to about the same proportion of clay·

                                                              size particles irrespective of water depth. In the

                                                              much more deep basins, where ca rbonate
                                                              solubility is higher than anywhere on the Sicilian-
                                                              Tunisian Plat!orm, this relationship may not hold.

Area Type n      GRAVEL      SANO                          SILT        CL/,Y     ..MEAN phi           CaC03
  A grab 18                ·;. .sQ                      •;. .sQ      ~ SQ
                ~ so                                                12.5 17.3     SQ..!.!}.         .% ~
                          76.3 20.0                     5.6 4.3
                5.6 7.6                                                          2 .81 1.86         97.0 0.9

131 3 24 .5 2 .4 49.4 0,3 5.9 2 .8 20.2 0.4 2.71 0.21 87.2 2.6 .

132 7 12 .0 7.3 78.2 18.7 l .5 1.3 8.3 10.7 2.00 0.88 93 .3 3.8

247 2 1 10.2 9.4 67.0 17.8 11 .6 7.6 11.2 60 2 .27 1.33 90.8 3 .4

248 20 8.3 6.0 74.1 16.0 8.0 5.6 9.6 5.5 2.08 0.90 92.9 4.0 .

249 18 9 .4 9.9 73.6 22.8 9.8 8 .6 7.2 6 .2 2.04 0.88 92.6 3 .1 .

250 7 55.1 29.7 31.9 20.6 9.3 8.2 3 .7 1.7 1.25 2.53 93.2 1.3 t

251 16 12.9 7.6 70.4 15.2 6.9 4.3 9.8 5 .7 l .73 1.00 91.2 4.0 :
                o
PB grab l                 3 .2 l 5.0 81.8 1.00

139 14 o                  7.5 9.4 19.5 7 .4 72.9 16.0 9.31 1.21 35.6 5.4 :

B grab 24 4.9 6.2 88.4 9.7 3.4 3.5 3.4 3 .7 1.86 0.57 96.2 1.9 :

133 5 7.6 2.8 82.6 4.7 4.9 1.4 4.9 2.1 1.96 0.21 91.3 2.4 ;

134 6 8.4 6.1 76.8 6 .5 5.4 1.9 9.4 3.1 2.38 0.39 91.8 1.§_ j

       141  25 2.9 2.0 73.1 14.1 11.1 5.6 13.0 9.9 3.15 1.14 86.9 7.2 ;
       252                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ·-. •-j
       253
            12 12.8 19.3 77.4 18.0 4.5 1.4 5.4 1.5 1.05 1.02 96.0 0.8 :
c 254                                                                                                        ...  ·1· ·.·_~~
            23  6.9  6.4  61.2  8 .8                    15.0  4.7   16.9   5.3   3 .45     1.04
       255                                                                                          90._4 .
       256
       257  17 3. l 6.5 28.0 4.2 58.7 12.8 10.2 7.3 4. 54 0 .90 34:9 :. 5 :~.j
       258
            25  1.4  2.5  30.5 19.9 ' 48. l                   12.2  18 .3  14.2  5.84      1.29  .  38.6 .        ?4·..0~-·lir
            20  0.6  2.0  68.7 ; 18.9 • 21.3                  7.3   9.9    11.7  4.64      1.10     30.1
                                                                                        .

            12 12.0 5.7 28.8 · 10:5 · 26.9 4.9 32.4 8, 1 5.31 0.96 ~~·?. . ~...~.j
            31 1. 2 3.4 9.6 : .12.4 44.9 10.9 44.3 10.7 7.94 1.18 29.6 . 5 .9

Table 7. Generalized grain size analyses for grab and core (numbered) samples. n: number of samples. A,
                          Adven!ure Bank; B. Lampedusa Bank; C, Malta Plateau; PB, Pantelleria.

                                                                1 27
   1   2   3   4   5   6