Page 3 - 4022883
P. 3

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 141 (2008) 699–709                                 701

Table 1 – Size (surface area of MPAs and related A zones), year of formal establishment, level of enforcement at the time
when fish sampling was done and presence of rocky substrates at the depth ranges sampled by visual census (a, b and c
indicate 4–7, 12–16 and 24–30 m depth, respectively) at the 15 MPAs investigated (see Section 2)

Marine protected area      Total    A zone Establishment Level of         Presence of          Number of

                           surface (ha) surface (ha)  (year)      enforcement rocky substrate  visual census

                                                                          (depth range) (A zone + fished = total)

Portofino                       346     18             1998        High          a, b, c        96 + 288 = 384
Cinque Terre                 2726      79             1997        Medium        a, b           64 + 128 = 192
Tavolara-Capo Coda         15,357    529              1997        Medium        a, b, c        96 + 288 = 384

   Cavallo                 25,673    529              1997        Low           a, b           96 + 128 = 224
Sinis-Isola Mal di Ventre    8598    332              1999        Low           a, b, c        96 + 288 = 384
Capo Carbonara               2799    410              1997        Medium        a              24 + 48 = 72
Isole Ventotene-Santo
                             1539    181              1997        Low           a              24 + 48 = 72
   Stefano                 14,721    585              1991        Medium        a, b, c        96 + 96 = 192
Punta Campanella           53,992   1067              1989        Low           a, b           32 + 64 = 96
Capo Rizzuto               15,951                     1986        Medium        a, b, c        96 + 192 = 288
Isole Egadi                            60             1989        Low           a, b, c        96 + 128 = 224
Isola di Ustica                623     35             1997        Low           a, b           64 + 128 = 192
Isole Ciclopi              16,654    173              1991        High          a, b           64 + 64 = 128
Porto Cesareo                        179              1989        Medium        a, b, c        72 + 144 = 216
Torre Guaceto                2227    180              1986        High          a              16 + 32 = 48
Isole Tremiti                1466      30
Miramare
                               120

2. Materials and methods                                          all 15 locations (i.e. each spatial unit including reserve and
2.1. Sampling areas and procedures                                nearby fished sites) between May 2002 and October 2003.

We examined fish response to protection in 15 Italian marine           Replicated visual censuses were done at several reserves
reserves (Mediterranean Sea; Fig. 1) during two to four sam-      and nearby fished sites at each location. We focused on fish
pling campaigns (depending on the reserve) carried out at         associated with rocky reefs because (1) rocky reefs are the
                                                                  most common habitat protected within the entire system of
Fig. 1 – Location of the 15 MPAs studied along the coast of       marine reserves in Italy (Boero et al., 2005); (2) previous visual
Italy (PO: Portofino; CT: Cinque Terre; TA: Tavolara-Capo          census studies showed that rocky reefs host the most of fish
Coda Cavallo; SI: Sinis-Isola Mal di Ventre; CC: Capo             targeted by fishing and therefore these fish assemblages more
Carbonara; VS: Isole Ventotene-Santo Stefano; PU: Punta           clearly respond to protection from fishing than others (Fran-
Campanella; CR: Capo Rizzuto; EG: Isole Egadi; US: Isola di       cour, 1994). Fish assemblages in fished areas were sampled
Ustica; CI: Isole Ciclopi; PC: Porto Cesareo; TG: Torre Guaceto;  outside the MPAs or within the ‘B or C zones’ when no alter-
TR: Isole Tremiti; MI: Miramare).                                 natives were available (e.g. at MPAs entirely encompassing
                                                                  small islands far away from the mainland). The use of buffer
                                                                  zones to contrast no-take reserves is supported by recent
                                                                  studies that suggest the ineffectiveness of partial closures
                                                                  for target fish species (Denny and Babcock, 2004). All of the re-
                                                                  serves investigated had the same level of formal protection
                                                                  (fully no-take), in contrast to fished conditions. The MPAs
                                                                  and reserves investigated, the year of formal establishment,
                                                                  and the level of enforcement during the period when fish
                                                                  were sampled, are all reported in Table 1.

                                                                      We assessed densities and size of fish in natural rocky
                                                                  reefs, except at Miramare where fish were sampled in artifi-
                                                                  cial habitats (i.e. jetties formed by transplanted boulders),
                                                                  both within the reserve and fished sites. Fish were sampled
                                                                  from about 5–30 m depth, depending on the distribution of
                                                                  rocky habitats at each location both in the reserves and fished
                                                                  sites. Sampling was done by visual census along transects
                                                                  25-m long and 5-m wide according to the ‘strip transect’
                                                                  method (Harmelin-Vivien et al., 1985). Overall, 3096 visual
                                                                  censuses were done (sampling effort at each location is
                                                                  reported in Table 1). Fish density was estimated by counting
                                                                  single specimens to a maximum of ten individuals, whereas
                                                                  classes of abundance (11–30, 31–50, 51–100, 101–200, 201–
                                                                  500, >500 individuals) were used for larger schools. Fish size
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8