Page 4 - Bacci_Pagoto_etali_2015
P. 4

Author's personal copy

           2                                                                             Ann Microbiol (2015) 65:1–13

           Hernandez et al. 2012), consequently hampering functional  conditions present in the beach and then stored at −80 °C
           studies and biodiversity estimations in such an “extreme”,but  prior to DNA extraction. We cannot exclude that for some
           common environment. In fact, the large fluctuations in tem-  samples the storage conditions could have affected the relative
           perature, humidity, salinity and nutrient of sandy beaches,  abundance of some taxa.
           especially in a temperate zone, could allow for consideration  Physical-chemical characteristics are reported in Table 1.
           of these environments as nontypical, when compared to soil or  Determination of organic carbon (TOC) present in the test
           water environments. Additionally, the supralittoral zone of  samples was performed following a standard protocol (Italian
           sandy beaches may also contain human pathogens, due to  Official Bulletin, G.U. n ° 248 of 10.21.1999) with a Perkin
           human impact by recreational use of beaches, or urbanization  Elmer elemental analyzer CHNS/O Series II model 2400.
           (see for examples Bonadonna et al. 2003; Mudryk 2005;  Granulometry was analyzed by particle size analysis using
           Ugolini et al. 2008).                              standard procedures (Bowles 1988;Head 1984).
             The aim of this work is to provide a first insight into the
           composition of bacterial communities present in supralittoral  DNA extraction, T-RFLP profiling, functional genes
           sediments of Mediterranean sandy beaches by using three  detection and real-time PCR
           beaches at Favignana Island (Italy), which are differentially
           exposed to wind and water streams and to anthropic impact.  DNA was extracted from sediments, after homogenization of
                                                              the total sample contained in the 50 ml polypropylene sterile
                                                              tube, by using a commercial kit (Fast DNA Spin kit for soil,
           Material and methods                               QBiogene, Cambridge, UK), following manufacturer’s
                                                              instructions.
           Sampling site description, sampling procedure        The 16S rRNA genes were amplified from extracted DNA
           and physico-chemical characteristics               of all 27 collected samples with primer pairs 27f and 1495r, as
                                                              previously reported (Trabelsi et al. 2009). Terminal-
           Samplesof subsurfacesand(5cm below the surface) were  Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) proce-
           taken in summer 2011 in three beaches of Favignana Island  dure was then followed on purified amplification products. In
           (Italy). The Favignana Islands are part of the Protected Marine  particular, amplicons were digested separately with restriction
           Area “Isole Egadi”, located in the Southern part of  enzymes TaqIand AluI and digestions were resolved by cap-
           Mediterranean sea, in close proximity to Sicily Island (Italy)  illary electrophoresis on an ABI310 Genetic Analyzer
           and is characterized by Lower Pleistocene carbonate  (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using LIZ 500
           grainstones. The three main beaches present in the Island were  (Applied Biosystems) as a size standard. T-RFLP analysis was
           sampled, namely, Praja (37°55′45.62″ N, 12°19′30.66″ E),  performed on two technical PCR replicates from each DNA
           which is located in close proximity to the main urban centre  extract, as previously reported (Mengoni et al. 2005). Only
           of the island on the north-east coast; Lido Burrone (37°55′  peaks present in both duplicate runs were considered for
           9.67″ N, 12°18′24.67″ E), a touristic beach on the south-west  successive analyses.
           coast, and Faraglioni (37°56′42.83″ N, 12°16′46.93″ E), a  Real-Time PCR for quantification of bacterial cells was
           beach with limited touristic use, due to lack of main roads  performed estimating the number of 16S rRNA gene copies
           for accessing it, on the north-west coast. From every beach, a  with bacterial primers Eub341F (5′- CCTACGGGAGGCAG
           transect from the damp band to the upper limit of the beach  CAG-3′) and Eub515R (5′-TACCGCGGCKGCTGGCA-3′)
           (thereafter referred to as the “Y-axis”) was done considering  targeting the 16S rRNA gene, as reported by Simmons and
           three sampling points: i) the damp band (here named as the  coworkers(Simmonsetal. 2007), using genomic DNA of
           shore-line), ii) the intermediate zone between the damp band  Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm1021 as the concentration standard
           and the upper limit of the beach (named as the mid-line) and  for copy number calculation (genome size 6.9 Mbp). Data
           iii) the upper limit of the beach, 1 m before the dune zone and  obtained were compared with one-way ANOVA.
           the vegetation (named as the upper-line). For each sampling  Functional diversity was evaluated by PCR amplification
           point, three samples 20-cm apart from each other, were taken  of nifH (encoding the nitrogenase reductase subunit), nosZ
           along an ideal line parallel to the shore-line. A total of nine  (encoding the nitrous oxide reductase gene) and pmoA/amoA
           samples per beach were taken. Sampling consisted of filling  (the internal fragment of particulate methane monooxygenase
           completely a 50 ml polypropylene sterile tube inserted in  and ammonia monooxygenase genes, Holmes et al. 1995). For
           sandy sediment from its surface down to the total length of  nifH the semi-nested approach described in Widmer et al.
           the tube (ca. 10 cm). Due to the impossibility of immediately  1999 was used, following the amplification protocol reported
           storing at −80°C or extracting DNA, samples were stored with  in Giuntini et al. 2006.For nosZ, primers nosZ-F-1181 and
           an open lid at ambient temperature (25°C) for two days in the  nosZ-R-1880, were used (Rich et al. 2003) with the amplifi-
           dark, trying to simulate as much as possible the natural  cation protocol already reported (Pastorelli et al. 2011). For
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9