Page 6 - CAPPARIS_2006
P. 6

Volume 93, Number 1                     Inocencio et al.                    127
            2006                                    Revision of Capparis Sect. Capparis




             Table 2. List of morphological characters considered in the study.

                     Character                                   States
            1. Plant habit                 Erect / procumbent / pendulous
            2. Height                      Maximum length of the stems in meters
            3. Twig shape                  Tortuose / straight
            4. Twig color                  Green / yellowish / reddish / waxy
            5. Internodes                  Length in millimeters
            6. Stipule shape               Curved / somewhat curved / straight / setaceous
            7. Stipule orientation         Spreading / retrorse / antrorse
            8. Stipule base                Decurrent / not decurrent
            9. Stipule color               Orange-yellow / orange / golden-yellow
            10. Leaf shape                 Rounded / ovate / lanceolate / oblong / elliptical / obcordate /obovate
            11. Base of the leaf           Obtuse/ tapering / acute/ cordate
            12. Leaf apex                  Acute / rounded / obcordate / obtuse / truncate
            13. Mucro presence and length  Long (1–1.5 mm) / small (0.5–1 mm) / very small (0.1–0.5 mm) / lacking
            14. Mucro shape                Straight / curved
            15. Leaf texture               Herbaceous / fleshy
            16. Leaf veins prominence      Prominent / not prominent
            17. Petiole length             Very short (less than 0.5 cm) / short (0.5–1.5 cm) / long (exceeding 1.5 cm)
            18. Leaf abaxial indument      Very dense / dense / dense to lax / lax / very lax
            19. Trichome thickness         Thick (25–50 mm) / thin (15–25 mm)
            20. Trichome length            Long (250–900 mm) / short (50–250 mm)
            21. Fertile floral pedicel length  Long (greater than 4 cm) / short (1.5–4 cm)
            22. Fertile floral pedicel thickness  Thick (over 1 mm) / slender (less than or equal to 1 mm)
            23. Flower bud apex            Acute / rounded
            24. Abaxial sepal              Galeate / slightly galeate
            25. Flower symmetry            Zygomorphic / somewhat zygomorphic
            26. Number of stamens          Numerous (100–150) / not so numerous (40–80)
            27. Anther length              Very small (2 mm) / small (2–3 mm) / large (3 mm)
            28. Anther apex                Rounded / acute
            29. Fruit shape                Rounded / ellipsoidal / obovate / oblong
            30. Pulp color                 Red / yellow
            31. Seed color                 Brown/ dark brown
            32. Seed size                  Length 3 width 3 depth in millimeters



            preparing exsiccatae. Voucher specimens were de-  Distribution of species comprising several subspecies
            posited in MUB and UMH.                 is represented in Figures 2, 4, and 5. Habitat is
              Here we base species on morphological and  described using the available data on herbarium
            biogeographical features. The species represented  labels and those reported in the protologue of each
            are more or less distinct, heterogeneous, and variable  taxa. Phenology data are restricted to the flowering-
            morpho-physiological entities, the origin of which is  fruiting period according to the herbarium specimen
            associated with a particular environment and area in  labels and the protologue.
            agreement with Vavilov (1931). Taxa are defined in
            such a way that it is relatively easy to determine the  TAXONOMIC CHARACTERS IN CAPPARIS SECT. CAPPARIS
            ascription of each specimen to either one or another.
            Therefore, extremely large and variable species were  We have shown that molecular, phytochemical, and
            avoided. Discontinuities, both geographical and  in vivo data are useful for understanding patterns of
            morphological (see vestiture, stipules, leaves, inflo-  variation and, as such, were considered for the
            rescences, flowers, and fruits sections in this paper),  populations present in Spain, Morocco, Syria, and
            are good markers, but hybridization and hybrid  Lebanon (Inocencio, 2001; Inocencio et al., 2000,
            swarms have obscured the definition of species and  2002, 2005); however, these methods have not yet
            subspecies.                             been applied to the entire section. Therefore, we
              New taxa are represented in Figures 3, 6–9.  selected characters generally available in herbarium
              Geographic distributions have been plotted exclu-  specimens (Table 2), some of which have been used
            sively using the information from herbarium sheets.  for the first time in this study. For example, anther tip
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11