Page 133 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 133

Resemblance must be subjected to proof. Words and language were no longer ‘one of the


               figurations of the world’ but rather, ‘it is the task of words to translate the truth’ (Foucault


               1989, p. 2). Foucault supposes that this new configuration is called rationalism, and that ‘the

               seventeenth century marks the disappearance of the old superstitious or magical beliefs and

               the entry of nature, at long last, into the scientific order’ (1989, p. 60). It was not, however,


               that ‘reason made any progress: it was simply that the mode of being of things, and of the

               order  that  divided  them  up  before  presenting  them  to  the  understanding,  was  profoundly


               altered’ (Foucault 1989, p. xxiv).

                       Enlightenment thinking and its colonial endeavours were part of the making of this


               new period. Nature moved from the temper of God into the hands of “man”. This gave rise to

               the  thinking  that  “uncultivated  land”  (by  European  terms)  was  available  for  the  taking

               (Probyn 2000, p. 104). For example, the myth of terra nullius was founded upon the conceit


               not only of empty land but also that indigenous people could not or would not cultivate their

               land.  This  period  did  not  necessarily  mark  a  sever  between  nature  and  God/divinity  and


               certainly  the  Romantics  maintained  that  nature  was  a  medium  of  spirituality.  In  addition,

               colonial possession of land was justified in terms of a ‘divine authority’ (Governor Phillip


                                                                                                         th
                                                                                               th
               Letter  to  Lord  Grenville  in  Probyn  2000,  p.  104).  Rather,  throughout  the  18   and  19
               centuries several ideas emerged that shifted agency to within nature itself and developed the


               idea  that  humans,  rather  than  divine  entities,  have  control  over  nature.  Part  of  the  new

               ordering of nature was the rise of new disciplines, as well as authoritative figures such as


               botanists,  agronomists  and  ichthyologists,  who  remain  important  figures  in  sustainability

               practices and debates today. Ordering of the environment took on particular material forms

               through  collecting,  naming  and  classifying.  Natural  science  studies  and  the  knowledge  it


               produced began to take disciplinary shape and form institutional spaces. During this period






                                                                                                      121
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138