Page 139 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 139

105-109).  This  was  enabled  by  the  legal  framework  of  the  Freedom  of  the  Seas,

                                                 th
                   which had been set down in 17  century by a Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius in the book

                   Mare  Liberum  (Freedom  of  the  Seas).  Beyond  a  three  nautical  mile  belt  along  the


                   coast, the law stated the seas are free to all and owned by none. In this period the seas

                                                                                   th
                   were still largely seen as inexhaustible. In Iceland during the 18  century, the new
                   capitalist relations and paradigm introduced different concepts of nature, production,


                   fishing  and  fish.  ‘In  particular  the  relative  power  of  fish  to  humans  was  reversed’

                   (Pálsson 1991, p. 103). Human labour came to be viewed as creating value and ‘[t]he


                   peasant’s  mythology,  and  its  image  of  the  cosmic  order  replaced  by  the  notion  of

                   infinite  natural  resources’  (Pálsson  1991,  pp.  100-110).  Nature  was  considered


                   random but calculable and the term “fishing by cleverness” entered the vocabulary

                   (Pálsson 1991, p. 130). The role of the skipper became more important and the crew

                   relationships  hierarchical.  In  this  period  fishing  technology  underwent  important


                   changes. Complex gear was introduced – long lines, gillnets and trawls – and the value

                   of certain fish also changed, as European and American tastes began to define the


                   market.  Some  of  the  fish,  which  in  the  past  were  considered  inedible  and  smelly,

                   became a delicacy (Pálsson 1991, p. 109).


                          The  third  phase  emerged  with  the  threat  of  overexploitation  in  the  1960s.

                   Pálsson argues that this lead to the ‘social authority of marine biological research’ and


                   with  this,  a  scientific  discourse  on  resource  use  (Pálsson  1991,  p.  133).  Biological

                   information became the authoritative knowledge and the new rationale that emerged


                   was based on the idea that humans are collectively responsible for the maintenance of

                   fish and the seas (Pálsson 1991, p. 133). On a local level, fishing success became less

                   about fishiness or skill, or the size of catch due to the new ceiling on production, and


                   more  about  capital,  technology,  gear  and  ecological  factors.  The  credibility  of  the




                                                                                                   127
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144