Page 186 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 186

The tonnara and its new configuration that includes a sea cage (top left hand corner of

               fig 4.9) was certainly a dingpolitik. As I will explain below, with reference to interviewees,


               there was a lot of frustration over the unfair regulation of the  tonnara and anxiety for its


               future.  As  I  outlined  in  the  previous  section,  a  common  complaint  was  that  the  tonnara

               should not be penalised like industrial fisheries should be. The owners and some tonnarotti

               argued that the tonnare should have a higher portion of the quota. They suggested that the


               regulations  do  not  take  into  consideration  their  different  fishing  practices  and  technology.

               They also raised the issue of representation and expertise in fishery policy. Many fishermen


               that I spoke with, not only from the tonnare but up and down the coast of Italy, raised the

               point that the fishery rules are made in the north of Europe (for example the EU Common


               Fishery Policy) and do not understand or take into consideration the particular context of the

               south.  The  concerns  not  only  included  the  claim  that  the  regulations  unfairly  penalise  the

               small-scale  fisheries,  but  also  revealed  tensions  about  who  has  the  authority  to  make  and


               enforce  regulations.  To  better  understand  the  contemporary  situation  –  introduction  of  sea

               cage, decline of mattanza and thus local harvest and organ trade, and risk of closure – we


               need to explore these particular tensions produced through pressures from fishery regulations

               and  competition  with  industrial  fisheries  in  the  tuna  market,  including  also  for  quota


               allocation.




               Regulating the tonnara and quota wars

               The  issue  of  quota  allocation  and  surrounding  tensions  is  summarised  by  the  term  “quota


               wars” (Addis 2013). According to Giuliano for the tonnara to be financially sustainable they


               need at least 100 tonnes per trap. The consortium has three traps in total. He explains that if

               they manage and set one trap in the regular way, with a crew of about 60 people, it costs them

               about 500,000 Euro for each tonnara every year	(G Greco 2013, pers. comm. 31 May). In




                                                                                                      174
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191