Page 254 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 254

Fig. 6.3 Comparison between employment on large-scale and small-scale fleets. Source FAO (2008).


                       While  the  proposal  calls  upon  the  long  cultural  history  of  the  traps  and  thus  gives


               weight to the term traditional and artisanal, it does so strategically and in combination with an

               appeal to science. This is how it differentiates the traps from the purse seines. It comes as no

               surprise that Piero Addis and his team, who were also instrumental in arguing for the trap’s


               data potential, undertook one of the few social studies. The EU proposal draws on a cultural

               history and socio-economic analysis (highlighting local eating habits and trap/mattanza tours)


               of the tonnara and relates it to the trap’s capacity to continue the historical collection of data.

               It  makes  a  powerful  argument  that  sits  neatly  within  a  marine  science  discourse.  In  other


               words, the cultural history in combination with the historical data has enabled the traps to be

               a  data  gold  mine  and  therefore  a  tool  for  future  tuna  management.  Actually,  as  the  study


               argues, the traps have become the most reliable ICCAT scientific observatory for the Atlantic

               and eastern bluefin stocks (Ambrosio & Xandri 2015, p. 45). Trap data:


                                                                                                      242
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259