Page 257 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 257
for those who fish tuna or understand their identity and community in part through their
relationship to the tonnara and tuna? How is this new assemblage forming? Is the tonnara
still a tonnara without some of the principle practices (e.g. mattanza, curing tuna) that have
endured along with the tonnara for centuries? The focus on gear and the legitimisation of the
trap as traditional and as a data generator, curtails these concerns that are highly pertinent for
locals. Furthermore, the focus on gear denies that the trap is embedded in wider practices that
make the tonnara meaningful for some participants.
This is as much an ontological question as it is a technical and classificatory question.
If we return to the idea that the tonnara, like a fishery, is a hybrid assemblage, then the
relationships among the components and the makeup of those components are surely
important to the tonnara as an entity. If we understand the tonnara as formed through an
assemblage of human and more-than-human entities, then it follows that the relationships
among those entities is important to the ontology of the tonnara: especially when considering
that the purpose of the tonnara is now to operate a scientific laboratory. This is to understand
the tonnara as constituted through relational practices, and to understand those people who
participate in the tonnara, as also constituted in part through relational practices. This
framing positions practice as the means through which relations are enacted and transformed
(Zeigler 2014, p. 10). To practice mattanza or to process and preserve tuna is also to practice
relationships among fishermen, and between fishermen and tuna. Of course these
relationships have been in continual transformation but they have endured until recently, as
part of the complex relationships that have made up the tonnara. If these relationships no
longer exist then what has the tonnara become? Can we still say that the tonnara is a tonnara
without these relationships? This is a question about the degree of change that can take place
for an entity to transform into an entirely different entity. It is also a question of what
constitutes the socio-cultural dimensions of a fishery. As we have seen, transformations have
245