Page 257 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 257

for  those  who  fish  tuna  or  understand  their  identity  and  community  in  part  through  their

               relationship to the tonnara and tuna?		How is this new assemblage forming?  Is the tonnara


               still a tonnara without some of the principle practices (e.g. mattanza, curing tuna) that have


               endured along with the tonnara for centuries?  The focus on gear and the legitimisation of the

               trap as traditional and as a data generator, curtails these concerns that are highly pertinent for

               locals. Furthermore, the focus on gear denies that the trap is embedded in wider practices that


               make the tonnara meaningful for some participants.

                       This is as much an ontological question as it is a technical and classificatory question.


               If  we  return  to  the  idea  that  the  tonnara,  like  a  fishery,  is  a  hybrid  assemblage,  then  the

               relationships  among  the  components  and  the  makeup  of  those  components  are  surely


               important to the tonnara as an entity. If we understand the tonnara as formed through an

               assemblage  of  human  and  more-than-human  entities,  then  it  follows  that  the  relationships

               among those entities is important to the ontology of the tonnara: especially when considering


               that the purpose of the tonnara is now to operate a scientific laboratory.  This is to understand

               the tonnara as constituted through relational practices, and to understand those people who


               participate  in  the  tonnara,  as  also  constituted  in  part  through  relational  practices.  This

               framing positions practice as the means through which relations are enacted and transformed


               (Zeigler 2014, p. 10). To practice mattanza or to process and preserve tuna is also to practice

               relationships  among  fishermen,  and  between  fishermen  and  tuna.  Of  course  these


               relationships have been in continual transformation but they have endured until recently, as

               part of the complex relationships that have made up the tonnara. If these relationships no


               longer exist then what has the tonnara become? Can we still say that the tonnara is a tonnara

               without these relationships? This is a question about the degree of change that can take place

               for  an  entity  to  transform  into  an  entirely  different  entity.  It  is  also  a  question  of  what


               constitutes the socio-cultural dimensions of a fishery.  As we have seen, transformations have




                                                                                                      245
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262