Page 53 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 53

a trial, the unexpected beings necessary for an entity to exist’ (Latour 2011, p.799).  Latour is

               thus interested in how the local is networked and therefore the global is less relevant. From


               this starting point the Coles eco tin is made possible via a series of local socio-technical and


               material  networks,  which  connect  distant  places  –	 Maldives,  Thailand,  a  Sydney  Coles

               supermarket. For my topic, the notion of assemblage is more helpful. And so another way of

               addressing  the  methodological/theoretical  challenge  of  studying  the  surface,  is  by


               understanding  following  as  a  kind  of  assemblic  ethnography  (Zigon  2015).  Assemblic

               ethnography  adds  a  theoretical  framing  of  assemblage  to  the  practice  of  following:  it  is


               ethnographic  research  within  and  across  the  multiple  sites  and  things  of  a  sustainability

               assemblage.  It  involves  attuning  to  the  biocultural  collaborations,  to  how  dispersed  and


               diverse  components  assemble,  and  to  what  that  assembling  generates.  It  means  paying

               attention  to  the  conditions  of  possibility  and  of  limitation.  ‘As  method,  assemblic

               ethnography chases and traces a situation through its continual process of assembling across


               different global scales and its temporally differential localization in diverse places’ (Zigon

               2015, p. 515). Thus the kind of ethnographic research I am suggesting does not simply move


               from one site to the next, or from one part of a commodity chain to the next (like Cook et. al.

               advocate),  but  rather  moves  along  diverse  assemblic  relations  and  local  manifestations.  It


               follows  assemblages  that  make  possible  an  entity  like  the  Coles  eco  tin.

                       To  understand  better  the  significance  of  researching  assemblages  we  need  to


               understand  the  usefulness  of  the  concept  of  assemblage.    George  Marcus  and  Erkan  Saka

               suggest that assemblage is used in analysis and writing to address the ‘modernist problem of


               the heterogeneous within the ephemeral, while preserving some concept of the structural so

               embedded in the enterprise of social science research’ (2006, p. 102). Such a tension between

               heterogeneity and structure is certainly present in analyses such as mine, which are global in


               scope, yet take interest in and are informed by particular local situations and ethnographic






                                                                                                        41
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58