Page 54 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 54
encounters. The global/local concept that I advocate is mutually contingent and can be
understood through the notion of a global assemblage which I described earlier. Collier
argues that the global assemblage is an alternative to the categories of global and local, which
designates the global as abstraction, and defines the local in terms of specificity (2006, p.
399). It is precisely the productive work of categorising the global and local, among other
binaries such as nature/culture and traditional/modern that I would like to question. We can
talk for instance about a global fishery crisis and global fishery management but we are also
talking of heterogeneous components that come together and work to create this crisis and its
response. As Collier puts it, ‘a global assemblage is the actual and specific articulation of a
global form’ (2006, p. 400). Thus a global fishery or a global sustainability crisis, as well as
the global knowledge used to address such a crisis are global forms that in actuality are made
of heterogeneous assemblages. Here I am referring to the global not only as a spatial and
scalar sphere but also as a process of universalising. ‘[T]he “global” is an effect not a
condition, and uneven rather than uniform, perhaps best understood in terms of specific
connections and encounters that work across and through difference’ (Braun 2006, p. 644).
Assemblage is useful not only to understand the different scales on which sustainability
operates, but also to understand better the emergence of markets and products such as a
sustainable tin of tuna. Hawkins et al. (2015, p. xvi) explore the emergence of markets for
plastic bottled water and suggest that assemblage is a term that captures the dynamic process
of markets as tentative and unfolding. That is, the generative capacity of markets as emerging
‘through the process of arranging various sociotechnical, corporeal, discursive, and material
elements’ (Hawkins et al. (2015, p. xvii). Assembling is ‘the ongoing labour of bringing
disparate elements together and forging connections between them’ (Li 2007, p. 263). As
such the process becomes important rather than a final arrangement (Li 2007, p. 263). This
approach directs attention away from use of macrostructures, such as capitalism and
42