Page 76 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 76

campaigning.  In relation to the tinned tuna industry, the ecological problem is articulated as

                                                                                33
               a problem of destructive industrial fishing practices, use of FADs , bycatch, illegal fishing,

               and the fishing of vulnerable tuna species. The international response to this ecological crisis


               extends  beyond  inter-governmental  bodies  to  numerous  environmental  NGOs  and  private

               governance.  For  example,  Greenpeace  has  led  a  rigorous  campaign  naming  and  shaming

               tinned  tuna  brands  through  a  ranking  system.  Greenpeace  has  pressured  industry  into


               changing  sourcing  and  labelling  practices,  and  advocates  for  brands  that  fulfill  the

                                                  34
               Greenpeace  sustainability  criteria .  Private  forms  of  fishery  governance,  such  as

               sustainability certification schemes, emerged in the 1990s (Auld 2014, p. 186) and now as

               much  as  17  percent  of  the  world  ocean-capture  production  is  certified  (Washington  &


               Ababouch 2011, p. xiii). Since it began in 1996 MSC has become the leading global certifier.

               Between 2009 and 2014 the number of MSC certified fisheries doubled, with 216 listed in

               2014 (MSC 2014, p. 7) and by 2016 there were 286 across 36 different countries, resulting in


                                                              35
               20,000  labelled  products  (MSC  2016a,  p.  7) .  Further  highlighting  the  significance  of
               certification,  the  Globefish  (Food  and  Agriculture  Organisation  [FAO]  2012)  report  states


               that in 2012 retailers committed to selling sustainably sourced tuna was a key factor in global

               tinned tuna markets.


                       These  forms  of  environmental  governance  (institutional  structures,  monitoring

               regimes, expert figures and knowledge) are components of a sustainability assemblage. They


               contribute to the articulation of problems and their solutions. These components also function

               to  define  and  spread  the  term  sustainability,  along  with  expert  scientific  knowledge  and


               values  of  production  and  consumption.  In  other  words,  diverse  elements  –  technologies,

               discourses,  institutions,  markets,  knowledge,  experts  and  values  –  are  in  a  process  of

               assembling  around,  and  part  of  defining,  sustainability  problems  and  solutions,  and  also


               function to generate, define and circulate the term sustainability.






                                                                                                        64
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81