Page 11 - Lloreta_alii_2001
P. 11

RESULTS

                        BFT and NAO


                        As already depicted by Ravier and Fromentin (2001), spectra of BFT time series

                                                                         -1
                  were all strongly dominated by low frequencies (< 0.1 yr , i.e. periods > 10 yrs); short-

                  to medium-term variations being weak or negligible (Fig. 4). In contrast, no common

                  patterns emerged from the 3 NAO spectra. The instrumental Hurrell’s index presented a

                                                                                   -1
                  broad band spectrum dominated by short-term variability (> 0.4 yr ), with two smaller

                                                                                  -1
                  peaks at medium and low frequencies (around 0.3 and 0.05 yr ). Long-term signal
                  emerged from the longest NAO time series. The Cook’s index also displayed a broad


                                                                          -1
                  band spectrum with a peak at low frequencies (< 0.1 yr ) and secondarily at around
                                                                                                 -1
                                 -1
                  0.25 and 0.5 yr . Appenzeller’s index is dominated by low frequencies < 0.2 yr  (i.e.
                                                                            -1
                  periods > 5 yrs), with two peaks at around 0.02 and 0.15 yr . So, in contrast with BFT
                  spectra, medium- to short-term variability also appeared for all the three NAO indices.


                  Pairwise regression analyses between Hurrell’s index and BFT time series led to non-

                  significant relationships, as it is showed  by the boxplot of the p-values of the six


                  regressions (Fig. 5a). The slopes were always weak (ranging from -0.01 to 0.08,

                  Table 3). It is worth noting that an increasing length of the series (i.e. analyses with the


                  2 NAO proxies) did not lead to stronger relationships (Fig. 5a): most of the regressions

                  also appeared non-significant and the slope coefficients were low (and either positive or

                  negative, i.e., from 0.32 to 0.07, Table 3). The results of the GLS models (that took


                  autocorrelation into account) were similar  to the linear regressions and always non-

                  significant at 5% (Table 3). Correlation analysis confirmed the previous findings: 72%


                  of the correlation coefficients were non-significant; this proportion rose to 88% when

                  correction for multiple testing was applied. The results of all the above analyses









                                                            12
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16