Page 42 - Lo Cascio_2015
P. 42

570                                  PIETRO LO CASCIO




                                                                 Australasian islands (Fig. 7) constitute a clearly
                                                              distinct group from Lesser Sundas and Sulawesi
                                                              and are characterized by two main clusters: in the
                                                              first are included Maluku and the coastal islands
                                                              of  western  New  Guinea  (Biak,  Misool,  Roon,
                                                              Salawati,  Umboi,  Waigeo, Yapen),  while  in  the
                                                              other are grouped New Guinea, its eastern satellites
                                                              (Baronga,  Daru,  Kiriwina,  Lihir,  Normanby,
                                                              Woodlark, Yule) and Bismarck Archipelago (New
                                                              Britain, New Ireland, New Hanover). The greater
                                                              faunistic  affinity  found  between  Papuan  and
                                                              Bismarck islands is due to their geographical prox-
                                                              imity, but also to the fact that their faunas represent
                                                              fractions of the high diversity of New Guinea.
                                                                 Within the Sunda Islands (Fig. 8), where some
                                                              islands (Sulawesi, Borneo, Java) host a large num-
                 Figure 6. Species-area plot (log species  -log area ) for Afrotropi-
                 cislands. Numbers are as follows: 1) Bioko; 2) Fundo; 3)  ber of single-island endemics (SIEs), there is a very
                 Grande Comore; 4) Inhaca; 5) Koyaama; 6) Madagascar; 7)  low degree of similarity. Borneo and Sumatra are
                 Mafia; 8) Nosy Be; 9) Nosy Boraha; 10) Nosy Komba; 11)  grouped in one of the two main clusters, while the
                 Príncipe; 12) Samha; 13) São Tomé; 14) Socotra; 15) Zan-  other includes Java, Lesser Sundas and, slightly
                 zibar.
                                                              separate, Sulawesi.
                                                                 On the contrary, Japanese islands (Fig. 9) are
                 from Lelej, 2005; Tu et al., 2014), while respect to  characterized by a remarkable faunistic affinity and,
                 this latter the most “continental” Taiwan has a S/G  secondarily, have a certain similarity with Nansei
                 only slightly lower (3.16 ± 0.75); Sri Lanka (2.54  group and Sakhalin. With this latter, Japanese islands
                 ±  0.37)  to  India  (5.07  ±  1.44:  data  from  Lelej,  share some Palearctic elements widely distributed in
                 2005); Socotra (1.40 ± 0.24) to Yemen (2.05 ± 0.33:  the  continental  areas,  namely  Mutilla  Mikado
                 data from Lelej & Harten, 2006, 2014); Sicily (2.33  Cameron,  1900,  Cystomutilla  teranishii  Mickel,
                 ± 0.59) and Sardinia (2.00 ± 0.55) to Italy (2.66 ±  1935 and Taimyrmosa mongolica (Suárez, 1974),
                 0.65: data from Pagliano & Strumia, 2007); Crete  that conversely are lacking in the Nansei. Although
                 (1.60 ± 0.26) and Cyprus (1.63 ± 0.43) to, respect-  Nansei belong to the Indo-Malay region, it should be
                 ively, Greece (2.55 ± 0.58: data from Lelej et al.,  noted that these islands are more closely related to
                 2003a, 2003b; Pagliano, 2009) and Turkey (3.09 ±  Japan than to Taiwan, whose isolated cluster fits well
                 0.56: data fromYildirim & Lelej, 2012).      to its noteworthy faunal distinctiveness.
                   Furthermore, S/G for the above Mediterranean  Finally, the clusters of the Mediterranean area
                 islands seems to decrease in proportion to their  (Fig. 10) seem to reflect mainly the geographical
                 size with a significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis:  closeness  of  the  islands:  the  greater  similarities
                 H = 7.343, P = 0.03). A similar trend, albeit not  were found between Corsica and Sardinia, which
                 statistically significant, is found both within the  indeed belong to a distinct western insular group
                 Greater Antilles (Cuba: 2.75 ± 0.85; Hispaniola:  that includes also Sicily; for Malta and Lampedusa,
                 2.00 ± 0.70; Jamaica: 1.33 ± 0.33) and in compar-  that lie in the Channel of Sicily and relatively close
                 ison  to  the  smaller  but  “continental”  Trinidad  to North Africa; and for Crete and Rhodes, both
                 (2.33 ± 0.64).                               placed in the Aegean Sea. Probably due to its eastern-
                                                              most and isolated localization, Cyprus shows a very
                 Faunal affinities                            low degree of similarity with all these islands.

                   Average  linkage  cluster  analysis  (UPGMA)  Endemism
                 using Jaccard’s coefficient was performed in order
                 to evaluate the faunal similarity within four island  Endemism at generic rank occurs only in a re-
                 groups.                                      stricted number of larger islands. Five distinctive
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47