Page 4 - Reverse_osmosis2016
P. 4

186                   S. Casimiro et al. / Desalination and Water Treatment 61 (2017) 183–195

           2014, they had all been replaced. (the first element of each   Table 2
           pressure  vessel is normally  replaced during  each  major   ROSA validation outputs
           maintenance operation, being the new replacement placed
           at the back of each pressure vessel).              Parameter      Real data  Modelled   Difference (%)
              In the validation procedure carried out in this work, it                  data
           is assumed that all membranes are new. The RO cross ref-  Permeate flow   34.0   34.8      +2.4
           erence tool [7] is used to determine the corresponding Dow   rate, m  h –1
                                                                   3
           membrane type with similar physical and operating charac-  Concentrate   54.0   52.5       –2.7
           teristics to the ones used at the Alvor plant.     flow rate, m  h –1
                                                                       3
              The plant is located at 17 m above sea level. It has three   Permeate    165   149.6    –9.3
           wells. One used as a water intake at –8 m below the sea   salinity, mg l –1
           level, one used to monitor the water level, salinity and tem-
           perature. In addition to a third well which acts as a brine   Concentrate   –1  52988   55431  +4.6
                                                              salinity, mg l
           discharge located at 30 m depth and connected to under-
           ground currents that carry the brine into the sea. It is the   Feed pump    60.0   55.5    –7.5
           furthest away from the plant to ensure that no mixing   pressure, bar
           occurs between the feedwater and the brine. The wells are
           located near the coast and the changing tide levels can have
           an impact on the operation of the plant by causing a mix-
           ture of underground fresh water streams with the seawater
           underground intake, which can lead to a decrease in the
           salinity of the feed water throughout the year (depending
           on the rainfall precipitation levels).

           3.2. Validation input data
              The validation of the ROSA model is done using the
           quality, mass flow rate, and temperature of the total feed
           water.  The  main  parameters  used  in  the  validation  are
           shown in Table 1.

           3.3. Output results
              The main results of the validation process are shown in   Fig. 3. RO real data vs. modelled data.
           Table 2, where real operational data at nominal conditions
           from the RO plant in Alvor are compared to the model out-
           puts for the general operating parameters of permeate and   compared to the  real  plant  outputs  (Fig.  3).  The  most
           concentrate flow rates and salinities, as well the feed pump   important finding is that the model under predicted the
           pressure.                                         feed pump pressure by around 7.5%. These marginal differ-
              The model predictions fall in the line with the opera-  ences can be attributed to simplifying assumptions within
           tional data from the plant, with an error margin of ~10%   the models mathematical algorithms, and to the quality of
                                                             the real data gathered. Performance parameters for nomi-
           Table 1                                           nal operation, regarding the water quality, were not collect-
           ROSA validation inputs                            ed during the technical visit to the plant, as it was not in
                                                             operation during the site visit and a shutdown procedure
           Parameter                       Value             in which fresh water is flushed through the membranes had
           Pre-stage ΔP, bar               0.345             been performed.
                                                                 As some of the water used for flushing was mixed with
           Feed water salinity (TDS), mg l –1  33800         each of the permeate and concentrate in the tanks, a direct
           No. of passes                   1                 measurements of conductivity would not return represen-
           No. of stages                   1                 tative results of normal plant operation. The conductivity
           Flow factor                     1                 data provided by the plant operators were used to estimate
           Recovery rate, %                40                the  feed  water total dissolved  solids based  on a  derived
           Feed flow rate, m  h –1         87                conductivity-to-total dissolved solids conversion factor [6].
                        3
                                                             Although it eliminates time consuming analytical testing of
           Membrane type                   SW30XHR-400i      the water, it is not the most accurate method for determin-
           No. of membranes in pressure vessel  6            ing feed water TDS values.
           No. of pressure vessels         9                     Additionally, it is possible that ROSA incorporates
           pH                              5.7               a  “safety  factor”  when  predicting  the  required  feed
           Water temperature,  C           18                pressure, as it is used to size the feed pump(s). Such an
                          o
                                                             embedded factor might influence the accuracy of the
           Pump efficiency, %              80                model, but gives a conservative approach from a design
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9