Page 9 - DAnna_et_al2016
P. 9
G. D’Anna et al. / Marine Policy ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎ 9
particularly since the start of the new Director and related in- References
itiatives in 2010, notably the switch to a bottom-up approach and
the related revision of the zoning scheme. The creation of a gov- [1] V. Stelzenmuller, P. Breen, T. Stamford, F. Thomsen, F. Badalamenti, A. Borja,
ernance body involving local stakeholders within the Trapani L. Buhl-Mortensen, J. Carlstom, G. D’Anna, N. Dankers, S. Degraer, M. Dujin,
LFMP paved the way for more public participation in the process, F. Fiorentino, I. Galparsoro, S. Giakoumi, M. Gristina, K. Johnson, P.J.S. Jones,
and has recently led to a well working E-MPA website, the pre- S. Katsanevakis, L. Knittweis, Z. Kyriazi, C. Pipitone, J. Piwowarczyk, M. Rabaut,
paration of guide books, the adoption of plans for preserving and T.K. Sorensen, J. van Dalfsen, V. Vassilopoulou, T. Vega Fernandez, M. Vincx,
restoring the Posidonia oceanica meadows around Favignana, and S. Voge, A. Weber, N. Wijkmark, R. Jak, W. Qiu, R. ter Hofstede, Monitoring and
an experimental approach to fight jellyfish invasions during the evaluation of spatially managed areas: a generic framework for implementa-
tourist season. This initiative represents the first attempt at an tion of ecosystem based marine management and its application, Mar. Policy
integrated management approach in the E-MPA, intended to en- 37 (2013) 149–164, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.012.
hance effectiveness in achieving the priority objective of main-
taining the favourable condition of conservation features in the [2] M.M. Foley, B.S. Halpern, F. Micheli, M.H. Armsby, M.R. Caldwell, C.M. Crain,
MPA. Also, the recent implementation of the Natura 2000 Egadi E. Prahler, N. Rohr, D. Sivas, M.W. Beck, M.H. Carr, L.B. Crowder, J.E. Duffy, S.
Islands Management Plan contributes to the conservation and D. Hacker, K.L. McLeod, S.R. Palumbi, C.H. Peterson, H.M. Regan, M.
sustainable use of the Egadi natural resources. H. Ruckelshaus, P.A. Sandifer, R.S. Steneck, Guiding ecological principles for
marine spatial planning, Mar. Policy 34 (2010) 955–966, http://dx.doi.org/
On the other hand, no strategic governance approach has been 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.001.
set in order to coordinate all existing initiatives regarding biodi-
versity conservation, fisheries and tourism. A coordination body is [3] Jones PJS et al. (2015) Marine spatial planning in reality (In this issue).
still missing, to the detriment of biodiversity conservation and of [4] P. Guidetti, M. Milazzo, S. Bussotti, A. Molinari, M. Murenu, A. Pais, N. Spanò,
sustainable use of living resources. A new governance approach
should be based on a clear management structure, represented by R. Balzano, T. Agardy, F. Boero, G. Carrada, R. Cattaneo-Vietti, A. Cau,
a permanent committee, including representatives of local in- R. Chemello, S. Greco, A. Manganaro, G. Notarbartolo di Sciara, G.F. Russo,
stitutions, NGOs, research bodies and local entrepreneurs, espe- L. Tunesi, Italian marine reserve effectiveness: does enforcement matter? Biol.
cially those involved in tourism and fisheries. Positive input in this Conserv. 141 (2008) 699–709, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.013.
regard might come from regional networks of MPA managers and [5] A.H. Himes, Small-scale Sicilian fisheries: opinions of artisanal fishers and
scientists, whose knowledge and experience could be useful to sociocultural effects in two MPA case studies, Coast Manag. 31 (2003)
work towards better governance in the E-MPA [11]. Using in- 389–408, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08920750390232965.
centives, knowledge from research and the intermediary role of [6] A.H. Himes, Performance indicator importance in MPA management using a
NGOs, an eco-social dialogue [13] among all stakeholders could be multi-criteria approach, Coast Manag. 35 (2007) 601–618, http://dx.doi.org/
attained, with benefits for the governance of the E-MPA. However, 10.1080/08920750701593436.
in order to gain an operational status, fundamental for a successful [7] A.H. Himes, Performance indicators in MPA management: using ques-
marine spatial management [14], the permanent committee tionnaires to analyze stakeholder preferences, Ocean Coast. Manag. 50 (2007)
should be appropriately funded and its opinion should be taken 329–351, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.09.005.
into account by decision makers. [8] P. Guidetti, J. Claudet, Comanagement practices enhance fisheries in marine
protected areas, Conserv. Biol. 24 (2010) 312–318, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/
Acknowledgements j.1523-1739.2009.01358.x.
[9] F. Badalamenti, A.A. Ramos, E. Voultsiadou, L.J.S. Lizaso, G. D’Anna, C. Pipitone,
We would like to thank Stefano Donati, director of the E-MPA; J. Mas, J.A.R. Fernandez, D. Whitmarsh, S. Riggio, Cultural and socio-economic
Francesco Bertolino of Biotecno; Giuseppe Sieli; the Favignana City impacts of Mediterranean marine protected areas, Environ. Conserv. 27 (2000)
Council; Carabinieri and Coast Guard of the Egadi Islands; the 110–125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900000163.
E-MPA staff; and last but not the least, all the interviewed stake- [10] A. Abdulla, M. Gomei, E. Maison, C. Piante, Status of Marine Protected Areas in
holders. Without the collaboration of all these people this study the Mediterranean Sea, IUCN, Malaga and WWF, Paris, 2008.
could not have been completed. This research was funded by the [11] G. Bustamante, P. Canals, G. Di Carlo, M. Gomei, M. Romani, H. Souan,
European Commission under the Monitoring and Evaluation of A. Vanzella Khouri, Marine protected areas management in the Caribbean and
Spatially Managed Marine Areas (MESMA) project (www.mesma. Mediterranean seas: making them more than paper parks, Aquat. Conserv.:
org), as part of the 7th Framework Programme, ENV.2008.2.2.1.1, Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24 (2014) 153–165, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2503.
grant agreement no. 226661. [12] F. Micheli, F. Niccolini, Achieving success under pressure in the conservation of
intensely used coastal areas, Ecol. Soc. 18 (4) (2013) 19, http://dx.doi.org/
10.5751/ES-05799-180419.
[13] L. Vasconcelos, M.J. Ramos Pereira, U. Caser, G. Gonçalves, F. Silva, R. Sá,
MARGov-Setting the ground for the governance of marine protected areas,
Ocean Coast. Manag. 72 (2013) 46–53, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
ocecoaman.2011.07.006.
[14] S. Katsanevakis, V. Stelzenmuller, A. South, T.K. Sorensen, P.J.S. Jones, S. Kerr,
F. Badalamenti, C. Anagnostou, P. Breen, G. Chust, G. D’Anna, M. Duijn,
T. Filatova, F. Fiorentino, H. Hulsman, K. Johnson, A.R. Karageorgis, I. Kroncke,
S. Mirto, C. Pipitone, S. Portelli, W. Qiu, H. Reiss, D. Sakellariou, M. Salomidi,
L. van Hoof, V. Vassilopoulou, T. Vega Fernandez, S. Voge, A. Weber, A. Zenetos,
R. ter Hofstede, Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: review of
concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues, Ocean Coast. Manag. 54 (2011)
807–820, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.09.002.
Please cite this article as: G. D’Anna, et al., Governance analysis in the Egadi Islands Marine Protected Area: A Mediterranean case study,
Mar. Policy (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.009i