Page 5 - Jakubas_et_al._2014_Storm_Petrels
P. 5

74 D. Jakubas et al.

Table 1. Location of the compared European Storm Petrel colonies, sample size of wing length (WL) and body mass (BM) and
source of data. Regions: ME — Mediterranean, SA — South Atlantic, NA — North Atlantic. – — lack of data, ? — lack of informa-
tion about sample size. * — site where individuals of H. p. pelagicus were captured during migration.

Colony                       Site               Location  Region WL (n) BM (n)  Source
                                                Italy
Subspecies H. p. melitensis  Marettimo Is.,                                     Albores-Barajas et al.
    AEG                      Aegadian Is                                        (2010)
                                                                                Lalanne et al. (2001)
                                                          ME 46     –
                                                                                Castro et al. (2013)
    COR                      Corse              France    ME ? ?                Medeiros et al. (2012)
Subspecies H. p. pelagicus
                             El Hierro Is.      Canaries  SA 79 79              Lalanne et al. (2001)
    CAN                      SW Atlantic coast  Portugal  – 936 934             James (1983)
    POR*                     Biarritz,                                          Scott (1970)
    BIS                      the Biscay Bay     France    SA 19 19              Evans (1977)
                             Skomer Is.         Wales                           Evans (1977)
    WAL1                     Skokholm           Wales     NA 46     –           Evans (1977)
    WAL2                     Puffin Island      Ireland                         Furness & Baillie (1981)
    IRL1                     Inishvickillaun    Ireland   NA  6681  5589        Furness & Baillie (1981)
    IRL2                     Inishnabro         Ireland                         Fowler et al. (1986)
    IRL3                     Hirta, St. Kilda   Scotland  NA 287 277            Furness & Baillie (1981)
    SCO1                     North Rona         Scotland                        this study
    SCO2                     Yell               Shetland  NA 336 2275           Nygård & Einvik (1991)
    SHE1                     Foula              Shetland                        Nygård & Einvik (1991)
    SHE2                     Nólsoy             Faeroes   NA 163 163
    FAR                      Heimøya            Norway
    HEI                      Røst               Norway    NA 827 827
    RØS
                                                          NA 125    77

                                                          NA 49     –

                                                          NA 108 108

                                                          NA 156 156

                                                          NA 34 34

                                                          NA 231 235

(ME — Mediterranean including Mediterranean               length (n = 6), tarsus length (n = 5), tail length
colonies of the bigger subspecies H. p. melitensis;       (n = 4) and bill length (n = 4). To test whether
and two groups of the smaller subspecies H. p.            there is a relationship between morphometrics
pelagicus: SA — South Atlantic including the south-       and SSD values (including POR) and between
ernmost colonies, NA — North Atlantic including           morphometrics, SSD and latitude/longitude (ex-
the northernmost colonies) (Fig. 2, Table 1) differing    cluding POR), we used the Spearman rank corre-
in environmental conditions (Appendix 1). We              lation coefficient.
investigated relationships between morphomet-
rics and environmental conditions in three scales:            Discriminant function for sex determination.
1) species scale including all colonies, 2) sub-
species scale including the colonies of the Atlantic      To determine the sex of adult European Storm
subspecies H. p. pelagicus (SA and NA combined);          Petrels, we used a discriminant function (DFA)
3) regional North Atlantic scale — including only         based on structural biometrics of birds captured in
colonies situated in the North Atlantic (NA).             the Faeroes. To find the best measurements for sex
                                                          identification, we did not use the stepwise
    Sexual size dimorphism. To investigate sexual         method as several authors strongly recommend
size dimorphism (SSD) in the European Storm               avoiding this procedure (reviewed in Dechaume-
Petrel, we used data collected in six different loca-     Moncharmont et al. 2011). Instead, we selected
tions, from individuals breeding in five colonies         the DFA with highest effectiveness among various
(CAN, AEG, WAL1, SHE 1 and FAR; abbreviations             functions with manually selected variables. We
— see Table 1) and caught on the Atlantic coast in        assessed the effectiveness of the DFA, first by
Portugal (POR) during migration (originating              examining the proportion of molecularly sexed
from the Atlantic population; Medeiros et al. 2012).      individuals that were classified correctly using all
                                                          individuals in the analysis (self-test), and second
    We measured SSD using the following formu-            by cross-validation (each case is classified by the
la: SSD = [(m-f)/(m)]*100, where m and f is the           functions derived from all cases other than that
mean value of specific morphological traits in            case). Due to unequal sample size for males and
males and females, respectively (Smith 1999).             females, we used a chance-corrected procedure
                                                          (Cohen’s kappa statistic) to determine if the classi-
    We performed analyses only for variables for          fication was better than random or chance alone
which we have data for > 3 locations, i.e. for wing
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10