Page 102 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 102

roundtable meeting I have referred to. Culture also gains a transactional reality across popular

               domains,  and  within  environmental  NGOs  (movements  such  as  Deep  Ecology  and  Slow


               Food)  and  popular  literature  on  ecology  there  is  an  appropriation  of  general  ideas  about


               indigenous cosmologies (Bruun & Kalland eds. 1995, p. 2). While we see clear hierarchies of

               concern  in  environmental  movements  (among  the  four  pillars),  the  association  of  cultural

               diversity with indigenous and non-Western “others” continues in their rhetoric. As I have so


               far outlined, in the early years of the new millennium this eventuated in both a widening of

               the discursive space of sustainability as well as a delimitation of that space. Although it was


               in many ways constructive in forwarding a culture agenda, in doing so it also reified culture

               along with the other pillars – society, economy and environment – or what Bennett (2013,


               p.12)  might  call  the  other  universal  concepts,  which  are  part  of  forming  the  concept  of

               culture. Bennett (2013, p. 13) argues that this is an:



                        ...assumption of the Anglophone tradition of cultural studies in which culture is
                        defined  as  the  realm  of  meaning-making  practices  to  be  considered  in  terms  of
                        their conditioning by, and consequences for, the conduct of economic and social
                        [for the purposes of this thesis we can add environmental] practices.




               He continues to argue that this is the logic underlying the cultural turn to propose an active

               role in the construction of social and economic life (Bennett 2013, p. 13), and we can add, the

               management of ecological life. For example, Hawkes articulates in his four-pillar proposal


               that  culture  extends  across  ‘every  aspect  of  human  intercourse:  the  family,  the  education,

               legal,  political  and  transport  systems,  the  mass  media,  work  practices,  welfare  programs,


               leisure pursuits, religion, the built environment…’ (2001, p. 3). In relation to this chapter the

               cultural turn manifests as a turn to cultural diversity – understood as a generalised notion of


               indigenous or other than Western. However, the logic of the cultural turn remains: culture

               extends across socio-economic and environmental worlds and should play a more active role

               in governing conduct. Such a project can be summarised as a turn to cultural diversity within




                                                                                                        90
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107