Page 100 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 100

Cultural  diversity  is  again  important  to  this  position  and  as  Apadurai  argues  ‘guarantees

               sustainability because it binds universal development goals to plausible and specific moral


               visions’ (Appadurai 2003, p. 16). He adds to this by saying that:



                        Biodiversity, in the long run, also relies on the maximum diversity of such moral
                        visions, since by definition, biodiversity requires the proliferation and protection
                        of many ecological regimes and environmental balances. (Appadurai 2003, p. 16)




               Here  cultural  diversity  is  not  only  modelled  on  biodiversity  (in  this  case  moral  diversity

               rather than biological diversity), it offers a solution for the continuation of humanity through


               ensuring biodiversity (Appadurai 2003, p. 16). There are a few more points to highlight from

               this quote. First, a moral vision of globalisation was forwarded, and secondly, that at the heart

               of  the  question  of  cultural  diversity  was  an  assumption  that  globalisation  equals


               homogenisation and destruction.

                       Over  a  decade  on  and  the  sentiments  of  the  late  1990s  and  early  2000s  echo  at  a


               global  level.  The  UN  and  its  various  offshoots  continue  to  be  the  main  institutional  force

               behind  these  global  debates  (see  Ashe  2014;  Abrell  et  al.  2009;  UNESCO  2012;


               Agenda21Culture  n.d.).  The  value  of  cultural  diversity,  which  both  Hawkes  and  the

               roundtable articulated, continues to define the four-pillar model of sustainability and as such,

               sustainability has developed into a kind of moral compass, playing a definitive role in a new


                                                                42
               cultural value: the value of cultural diversity itself .

                       Several issues arise in relation to the cultural diversity agenda. The first issue is that a

               paradox  is  presented  within  the  proposal  of  a  universal  value  of  cultural  diversity.  By

               promoting cultural diversity as a universal value of sustainability the notion of diversity is


               itself  undermined.  That  is,  if  incongruity  exists  between  diverse  values  then  the  value  of

               diversity is compromised and so is the proposition of sustainability. The second issue, which


               I elaborate on in the next chapter in relation to the term sustainability, concerns who in this





                                                                                                        88
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105