Page 248 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 248
Myths thus also contribute to the transformation of the tonnara through the particular
form of governance. Looking at the specific regional management of Atlantic bluefin through
ICCAT, we could say that the specific form of management (including myths, knowledge and
activities) enacts, what Callon and Law call, a ‘new totality’ (in Bear & Eden 2008, p. 494).
That is, a new assemblage has come into being through discourses of sustainability, the threat
of species loss and particular responses to that threat through fishery management. In this
contemporary context, the tonnara as a socio-technological hybrid entity has reconfigured
and a new tonnara has emerged made up of an assemblage that now includes fishery
scientists and legislation, and fish cages and fattening ranches. Most importantly, this is a
new ‘ontological reality’ (Hawkins & Race 2011, p. 114) for those who live by and from
tuna.
Within the norms of the global fishing industry where point of capture, harvest,
process and trade are often stretched over long distances and traverse several national
jurisdictions, it seems unremarkable to define the tonnara as a fishery (type of fishing gear
and species). It also seems acceptable that the harvest, processing and trade of bluefin now
stretch over similarly large distances. But it is worth remembering that some of the most
significant socio-cultural characteristics of the tonnara have until recently had much to do
with proximity between the trap and point of harvest and processing.
In summary, the mobilisation of tradition involves ‘establishing the borders of
permissibility’ (Schochet 2004, p. 296) and therefore defining and limiting what is, and
therefore is not, part of a tradition. The EU proposal that appeals to fishery policy by
positioning the tonnara as a traditional fishery is one example. In this case the borders of
permissibility are established first in the definition of a fishery and in naming the tonnara as a
fishery, and secondly, in the definition of tradition, and naming the tonnara as a traditional
fishery. This is an act of making possible the tonnara as a fishery divorced from its particular
236