Page 245 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 245

component. By focusing on gear and the role of the trap for data collection, tradition becomes

               less inclusive of the local community context and local harvest, processing and trade of tuna.


               Secondly, a spatial and typological relationship is formed, which previously was based on


               trade, empires and types of gear but now is based on use of gear (trap) defined as traditional

               in contrast to industrial fisheries. This takes place in a politically and culturally diverse region

               of the Mediterranean, grouping together the last surviving traps of Italy, Spain, Morocco and


               Portugal. This is what Mol and Law call “regional spaces”, ‘in which objects are clustered

               together and boundaries are drawn around each cluster’ (1994, p. 643). These kinds of spaces


               supress difference and promote uniform treatment of the objects within them (Bear & Eden

               2008,  p.  490).  Traps  of  the  Mediterranean  Sea  become  similar  objects  and  their  cultural


               particularities condensed. Indeed this invocation of tradition involves the construction of a

               biocultural  regionalism  that  brings  together  distant  and  diverse  spaces  and  their  histories,

               techniques and cultures. Each shares in common basic technical principles of intercepting and


               capturing  bluefin  with  a  fixed  net  trap.  Each  shares  some  history  through  technique  and

               knowledge sharing and also through trade. Nonetheless they are diverse spaces and include


               diverse  ecological  and  cultural  contexts,  which  can  be  erased  in  the  act  of  banding  them

               together within the contemporary fishery regime.


                       This  alliance  is  only  relevant  in  relation  to  industrial  fisheries,  in  fact  its  purpose

               seems to be to position the traps in opposition to and distinct from industrial fishing. Such an


               opposition can be analysed through Mol and Law’s (1994) notion of “network spaces”, which

               ‘are not defined by boundaries [unlike regional spaces] but by relationships’ (in Bear & Eden


               2008,  p.  490).  In  the  case  of  Atlantic  bluefin,  network  spaces  are  made  through  regional

               TACs. ICCAT allocates one TAC for the Mediterranean Sea and one for the Atlantic Ocean,

               and the TACs are then distributed as quota among nation states and then among the nation


                               82
               state’s  fisheries .  Quota,  as  a  central  device  of  fishery  policy  and  bluefin  management,



                                                                                                      233
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250