Page 84 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 84

Organization  (FAO)  implemented  a  series  of  projects  aimed  at  improving  post-harvest

               systems, and conducted scientific research on tuna stocks.


                       This  brief  history  raises  questions  about  the  potential  unintended  socio-cultural


               changes  brought  about  by  international  groups,  which  now  include  certifiers,  NGOs  and

               supermarkets. Following and assemblic ethnographic research, which considers cultural (in

               addition to ecological and economic) outcomes, could help to identify epistemological and


               ontological  changes  that  come  about  through  these  international  engagements.  Have  these

               engagements  introduced  new  skills,  knowledge,  authorities  or  norms?  Dunn  suggests;


               ‘[s]tandards work to shape economies because they are able to drive new norms down to the

                                                           37
               level of the individual’ (Dunn 2007, p. 183) . Is sustainability another phase in the political

               history  of  the  Maldives,  which  has  seen  outside  entities  engage  with  local  people  and

               practices?  And  how  should  we  understand  tradition  in  this  context  of  new  and  past

               relationships?


                       Another point to draw from this brief history is that we are always presented with a

               partial story. This is certainly the case for sustainability discourses presented in eco products


               and  campaigns.  I  have  demonstrated  how  contemporary  companies  narrate  a  story  of

               unchanged and unchangeable relationship to practice and place. Now I would like to consider


               what is left out of such narratives. There are many places, people and components that extend

               beyond tuna and the Maldives but remain invisible in the Coles eco tin.


                       Prior to the sustainable tuna movement, tinned tuna had been the ultimate displaced

               global  commodity,  the  quintessential  product  of  commodity  fetishism.  It  arrived  on  the


               supermarket shelf, its places of production obscured apart from the obligatory ‘made in...’

               Recent sustainability discourses draw attention to the fishery but the many other locations,

               materials, people, labour and technologies have become further obscured. This is more than


               an  oversight.  It  echoes  Val  Plumwood’s  suggestion  that  there  is  a  tendency  in  the  global






                                                                                                        72
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89