Page 94 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 94

institutions (even if recommendations have not been adopted in policy), and that in social

               science  fields  there  was  an  “environmental  turn”.  Yet,  as  I  argue,  both  (cultural  turn  in


               environmental management and environmental turn in social science fields) came to similar


               conclusions:  that  cultural  diversity  can  expand  the  intellectual,  philosophic  and  practical

               reservoirs of environmental management, and that traditional and indigenous knowledge is

               essential to the qualities of cultural diversity.


                       Three paradoxes arise from these turns. First, as Bennett (2013, p. 12) asks, what are

               we  to  make  of  culture  once  its  particular  universal  and  its  relationship  to  nature


               (nature/culture binary) is challenged as an organising principle? Along these lines I argue that

               breaking down nature/culture binaries in the context of environmental conflicts has led to the


               emergence of new binaries – traditional/modern and local/global. Secondly, the language of

               cultural  diversity  in  sustainable  development  discourse  begs  the  question  as  to  whether

               concepts  of  cultural  diversity  were  modelled  on  a  biodiversity  discourse.  And  thirdly,  the


               proposition  of  cultural  diversity  as  a  universal  value  can  undermine  the  very  notion  of

               diversity.




               Cultural Diversity: The Emergence of a Universal Value


               Within the period leading up to the turn of the millennium a throng of issues came to the table

               as  interrelated,  providing  the  conditions  for  the  integrated  concept  of  sustainability  to


               emerge: an integrated solution to interrelated matters. In the context of an increased global

               reach of technology, trade and media, came a growing concern over the detrimental force of


               globalisation.  Already  debates  on  the  relationship  between  international  trade  and  cultural

               protection  had  been  underway  since  the  end  of  WWI  (Burri  2010,  p.  1061).  In  the  1990s


               UNESCO  began  to  take  an  active  role  in  protecting  cultural  diversity  from  the  negative

               effects  of  economic  globalisation  (Burri  2010,  p.1063).  By  the  early  2000s  the  idea  of






                                                                                                        82
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99