Page 92 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 92

the sustainability concept is its insistence on interconnections and interdependencies’ (Gibson

               2006, p. 266), on the flip side the core problem of the sustainability project is the very same


               preoccupation  with  interconnections  and  interdependencies.  Acts  of  mobilising  culture  are


               also acts of defining culture. I therefore analyse the particular concepts of culture that have

               materialised and the processes of making and unmaking concepts of culture across diverse

               institutional setting. My aim is to tease out the reflexive ways that culture was put to use


               within environmental governance and how it emerged in relation to other categories, such as

               nature, society and economy and was translated into global policy arenas. I am particularly


               interested in the way that culture has been used to argue for pluralism in relation to ecological

               cosmologies and environmental management.


                       In  a  similar  way  that  the  project  of  multiculturalism  was  what  John  Frow  and

               Meaghan Morris (1993, p. ix) call a ‘compromise formation’ that shrouds contradictions and

               differentiations  within  a  community,  the  discourse  of  cultural  diversity  on  a  global  level


               espouses compromises. To unpack these compromises I draw on the work of Tony Bennett,

               who  argues  that  culture  is  a  ‘conceptual  universal’  along  with  other  sets  of  conceptual


               universals – e.g. nature, economy, society – which should be historicised (2013, pp. 11-12). I

               draw on Bennett’s historicising of the concept of culture through his proposal of the “culture


               complex”, which encompasses a broader range of knowledge practices and institutions in the

               governance of conduct’ (2013, p. 24). Bennett looks at the historic assemblage of culture and


               the  ‘role  played  by  epistemological  authorities  of  various  kinds  in  producing  new

               collectivities of actors and endowing these with specific capacities for acting on and changing


               conduct’ (2013, p. 26). This is way of analysing culture not simply as a complex of behavior

               patterns  but  as  a  set  of  control  mechanisms,  in  which  culture  becomes  conceptualised  as

               differentiated from the economy, politics and law, and understood as a ‘particular “sphere” of










                                                                                                        80
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97