Page 92 - KATE_JOHNSTON_2017
P. 92
the sustainability concept is its insistence on interconnections and interdependencies’ (Gibson
2006, p. 266), on the flip side the core problem of the sustainability project is the very same
preoccupation with interconnections and interdependencies. Acts of mobilising culture are
also acts of defining culture. I therefore analyse the particular concepts of culture that have
materialised and the processes of making and unmaking concepts of culture across diverse
institutional setting. My aim is to tease out the reflexive ways that culture was put to use
within environmental governance and how it emerged in relation to other categories, such as
nature, society and economy and was translated into global policy arenas. I am particularly
interested in the way that culture has been used to argue for pluralism in relation to ecological
cosmologies and environmental management.
In a similar way that the project of multiculturalism was what John Frow and
Meaghan Morris (1993, p. ix) call a ‘compromise formation’ that shrouds contradictions and
differentiations within a community, the discourse of cultural diversity on a global level
espouses compromises. To unpack these compromises I draw on the work of Tony Bennett,
who argues that culture is a ‘conceptual universal’ along with other sets of conceptual
universals – e.g. nature, economy, society – which should be historicised (2013, pp. 11-12). I
draw on Bennett’s historicising of the concept of culture through his proposal of the “culture
complex”, which encompasses a broader range of knowledge practices and institutions in the
governance of conduct’ (2013, p. 24). Bennett looks at the historic assemblage of culture and
the ‘role played by epistemological authorities of various kinds in producing new
collectivities of actors and endowing these with specific capacities for acting on and changing
conduct’ (2013, p. 26). This is way of analysing culture not simply as a complex of behavior
patterns but as a set of control mechanisms, in which culture becomes conceptualised as
differentiated from the economy, politics and law, and understood as a ‘particular “sphere” of
80