Page 8 - Sustainable_Energy_2018

M. Majidi Nezhad et al. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 30 (2018) 68–76
Wave Dragon emerges as the best technology for the site under [12] Thorpe TW. A brief review of wave energy. Tech. Rep. ETSU-R120, no.; May 1999,
analysis, particularly the 500 kW model results the best size obtaining a p. 200.
[13] Zhou G, Huang J, Zhang G. Evaluation of the wave energy conditions along the
high C f equal to 44.17% and a R f equal to 21.35%. All the other devices
coastal waters of Beibu Gulf, China. Energy 2015;85:449–57.
studied are not suitable for the specific study area since their R f values [14] A. R. Characterization and I. Costs. Wave Energy Utility Integration Wave
are lower than 10% showing that the devices work far from their best Integration Project; 2013.
[15] Reikard G, Robertson B, Buckham B, Bidlot J-R, Hiles C. Simulating and forecasting
performance H m and T e range.
ocean wave energy in western Canada. Ocean Eng 2015;103:223–36.
The integration of the Wave Dragon into the grid produces an high [16] Kim G, Jeong WM, Lee KS, Jun K, Lee ME. Offshore and nearshore wave energy
assessment around the Korean Peninsula. Energy 2011;36(3):1460–9.
amount of fuel savings and consequently strongly reduces the CO 2
[17] Hughes MG, Heap AD. National-scale wave energy resource assessment for
emissions. The energy system would reach a RES fraction equal to
Australia. Renewable Energy 2010;35(8):1783–91.
13.1% thanks to a WEC annual energy production equal to [18] Mirzaei A, Tangang F, Juneng L. Wave energy potential along the east coast of
1934.5 MWh/y. On the other hand, the introduction of such device Peninsular Malaysia. Energy 2014;68:722–34.
causes an increase of the excess energy produced mainly due to the [19] Kovaleva O, Eelsalu M, Soomere T. Hot-spots of large wave energy resources in
relatively sheltered sections of the Baltic Sea coast. Renewable Sustainable Energy
unused energy production during night time, it arises from a value of Rev 2017;74:424–37. July, 2015.
1.1% to 2.5% equal to a 360.9 MWh/y of unused energy. Thus, the [20] Aydoĝan B, Ayat B, Yüksel Y. Black Sea wave energy atlas from 13 years hindcasted
installation of an energy storage solution has also been studied. wave data. Renewable Energy 2013;57:436–47.
[21] Zodiatis G, et al. Wave energy potential in the Eastern Mediterranean Levantine
In particular, from the analysis developed, the optimal size of the
Basin. An integrated 10-year study. Renewable Energy 2014;69:311–23.
battery energy storage has a nominal capacity of 1 MWh and an usable [22] Saket A, Etemad-Shahidi A. Wave energy potential along the northern coasts of the
nominal capacity of 0.63 MWh. Doing so, the excess electricity pro- Gulf of Oman, Iran. Renewable Energy 2012;40(1):90–7.
[23] Soleimani K, Ketabdari MJ, Khorasani F. Feasibility study on tidal and wave energy
duced is reduced to a value of 0.8% thus obtaining a higher renewable
conversion in Iranian seas. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess
fraction, further fuel savings and thus, leading to a high carbon 2015;11(October):77–86.
avoidance, precisely 13.45% less than the baseline. [24] Alamian R, Shafaghat R, Miri SJ, Yazdanshenas N. Evaluation of technologies for
harvesting wave energy in Caspian Sea. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev
The last step consisted in running a sensitivity analysis in order to
2014;32:468–76.
assess the impact of an annual energy flux lower than the average one. [25] Ramos V, Ringwood JV. Exploring the utility and effectiveness of the IEC
To do so, the years, within the fourteen years long dataset, with lowest (International Electrotechnical Commission) wave energy resource assessment and
and the highest annual energy flux have been identified and the energy characterisation standard: a case study. Energy 2016;107:668–82.
[26] Vannucchi V, Cappietti L. Wave energy assessment and performance estimation of
system response has been analysed. The yearly fuel consumption re- state of the art wave energy converters in italian hotspots; 2016.
cords a minimum of 3017 l/y and a maximum value of 3311 l/y. The [27] Besio G, Mentaschi L, Mazzino A. Wave energy resource assessment in the
Mediterranean Sea on the basis of a 35-year hindcast. Energy 2016;94:50–63.
CO 2 emissions varies between the maximum value of 8682 tCO 2 /y and
[28] Ayat B. Wave power atlas of Eastern Mediterranean and Aegean Seas. Energy
a minimum of 7912 tCO 2 /y. It is noteworthy that the energy system is 2013;54:251–62.
able to supply the entire electric load in each of the analysed scenarios, [29] Iglesias G, Carballo R. Wave energy potential along the Death Coast (Spain). Energy
in fact, the unmet load is always equal to zero. 2009;34(11):1963–75.
[30] Clément A, et al. Wave energy in Europe: current status and perspectives.
The next steps of the research will include an economic feasibility
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2002;6(5):405–31.
study, in order to assess if the best performing technology is also the [31] Vicinanza D, Contestabile P, Ferrante V. Wave energy potential in the north-west of
best economic option, as well as to analyse the technical design of the Sardinia (Italy). Renewable Energy 2013;50:506–21.
[32] Akinyele DO, Rayudu RK. Review of energy storage technologies for sustainable
specific device.
power networks. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 2014;8:74–91.
[33] Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. Cost metrics of electrical energy storage technologies in
Acknowledgements potential power system operations. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess
2018,;25:43–59. December 2017.
[34] de Santoli L, Lo Basso G, Nastasi B. The potential of hydrogen enriched natural gas
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Civil deriving from power-to-gas option in building energy retrofitting. Energy Build
Engineering Department of Catania University and Favignana 2017;149:424–36.
[35] Nastasi B, Lo Basso G. Power-to-gas integration in the transition towards future
Municipality for their cooperation to provide all data. Finally, funding
urban energy systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42(38):23933–51.
and support by the PRISMI project, co-funded by the European Regional [36] Castellani B, et al. Experimental investigation on CO 2 methanation process for solar
Development Fund’s Interreg MED programme, is gratefully acknowl- energy storage compared to CO 2 -based methanol synthesis. Energies
edged. 2017;10(7):1–13.
[37] De Santoli L, Lo Basso G, Albo A, Bruschi D, Nastasi B. Single, cylinder internal
combustion engine fuelled with H2NG operating as micro-CHP for residential use:
References preliminary experimental analysis on energy performances and numerical simula-
tions for LCOE assessment. Energy Procedia 2015;81:1077–89.
[38] de Santoli L, Mancini F, Rossetti S, Nastasi B. Energy and system renovation plan for
[1] Beir P, Val D. Thermal modelling of the archimedes wave swing. Isope; 2007. p. Galleria Borghese, Rome. Energy Build Oct. 2016;129(129):549–62.
513–20. [39] de Santoli L, Mancini F, Nastasi B, Piergrossi V. Building integrated bioenergy
[2] Vicinanza D, Contestabile P, Quvang Harck Norgaard J, Lykke Andersen T. production (BIBP): economic sustainability analysis of Bari airport CHP (combined
Innovative rubble mound breakwaters for overtopping wave energy conversion. heat and power) upgrade fueled with bioenergy from short chain. Renewable
Coast Eng 2014;88:154–70. Energy 2015;81:499–508.
[3] Waters R, Engström J, Isberg J, Leijon M. Wave climate off the Swedish west coast. [40] Vicinanza D, Cappietti L, Ferrante V, Contestabile P. Estimation of the wave energy
Renewable Energy 2009;34(6):1600–6. in the Italian offshore. J Coast Res 2011;64(64):613–7.
[4] Silva D, Rusu E, Soares CG. Evaluation of various technologies for wave energy [41] “Geo Demo.” [Online]. Available: http://demo.istat.it/pop2017/index.html.
conversion in the portuguese nearshore. Energies 2013;6(3):1344–64. [Accessed: 17-Jul-2018].
[5] de Andres A, MacGillivray A, Roberts O, Guanche R, Jeffrey H. Beyond LCOE: a
[42] Kondili E, Kaldellis JK, Zafirakis D, Nomikos G, Christopoulos C. Thematic data
study of ocean energy technology development and deployment attractiveness.
collection – PRISMI; 2017.
Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 2017;19:1–16.
[43] Comune di Favignana. Arcipelago Delle Isole Egadi Piano D’ Azione Per L’ Energia;
[6] Khan J, Bhuyan GS. Global Technology Development Status, Report prepared by
2017.
Powertech Labs for the IEA-OES; 2009.
[44] HOMER Energy, “HOMER Pro 3.11 Help guide,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://
[7] Joubert JR, Van Niekerk JL, Reinecke J. Wave Energy Converters. 2013. no. 0, pp.
www.homerenergy.com/products/pro/docs/3.11/index.html. [Accessed: 18-Jul-
0–95.
2018].
[8] Iuppa C, Cavallaro L, Foti E, Vicinanza D. Potential wave energy production by
[45] Akinyele D. Techno-economic design and performance analysis of nanogrid systems
different wave energy converters around Sicily. J Renewable Sustainable Energy
for households in energy-poor villages. Sustainable Cities Soc. 2017;34:335–57.
2015;7(6).
[46] Akinyele DO, Rayudu RK, Nair NKC. Grid-independent renewable energy solutions
[9] Falcao AF de O. Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renewable for residential use: the case of an off-grid house in wellington, New Zealand. In:
Sustainable Energy Rev 2010;14(3):899–918. Asia-Pacific Power Energy Eng. Conf. APPEEC, vol. 2016–January; 2016. p. 1–5.
[10] Falnes J. A review of wave-energy extraction. Mar Struct 2007;20(4):185–201. [47] Novosel T, et al. Common methodology for RES assessment and mapping on the
[11] Drew B, Plummer A, Sahinkaya MN. A review of wave energy converter technology. Mediterranean islands, PRISMI deliverable 3.1.1; 2017.
J Power Energy 2009;223:887–902.
[48] Iuppa C, Cavallaro L, Vicinanza D, Foti E. Investigation of suitable sites for wave
75